CoolFace
Modelpublic

xujfcn/Crazyrouter-Model-Comparison

sourceHugging Facemitupdated 5mo agoView on Hugging Face
0likes
Model Card

๐Ÿ† Top AI Models Comparison โ€” May 2026

A practical, up-to-date comparison of the best large language models available via API as of May 4, 2026. Focused on real-world performance, pricing, and use-case fit โ€” not just benchmark scores.

Last updated: 2026-05-04 | Contributions welcome via PR

๐Ÿ“Š Model Overview

ModelProviderContext WindowInput Price (per 1M tokens)Output Price (per 1M tokens)Strengths
Claude 4 SonnetAnthropic200K$3.00$15.00Best overall coding + reasoning, extended thinking
Claude 3.7 SonnetAnthropic200K$3.00$15.00Excellent balance of speed and quality
Claude 3.5 HaikuAnthropic200K$0.80$4.00Fast and cheap, great for high-volume tasks
GPT-4.1OpenAI1M$2.00$8.00Large context, strong instruction following
GPT-4.1 miniOpenAI1M$0.40$1.60Budget-friendly, good for simple tasks
GPT-4oOpenAI128K$2.50$10.00Multimodal (text + image + audio)
Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle1M$1.25 / $2.50$10.00Huge context, strong reasoning + thinking
Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle1M$0.15$0.60 / $3.50Extremely fast and cheap
DeepSeek V3DeepSeek128K$0.27$1.10Best value for money, strong coding
DeepSeek R1DeepSeek128K$0.55$2.19Deep reasoning with chain-of-thought
Llama 4 MaverickMeta1MVariesVariesOpen-weight, self-hostable
Qwen3 235BAlibaba128KVariesVariesTop open-source, hybrid thinking
๐Ÿ’ก Prices are official API rates. Third-party providers often offer 20-50% discounts.

๐ŸŽฏ Best Model by Use Case

Coding & Development

TaskRecommendedWhy
Complex refactoringClaude 4 SonnetBest code understanding and generation
Quick code completionClaude 3.5 HaikuFast, accurate, low cost
DebuggingClaude 4 Sonnet / GPT-4.1Strong reasoning about code logic
Code reviewClaude 3.7 SonnetGood balance of depth and speed

Writing & Content

TaskRecommendedWhy
Long-form articlesClaude 4 SonnetNatural writing style, follows instructions well
TranslationGemini 2.5 ProStrong multilingual capabilities
SummarizationGemini 2.5 FlashFast, cheap, handles long docs
Creative writingClaude 4 SonnetMost natural and nuanced output

Data & Analysis

TaskRecommendedWhy
Data extractionGPT-4.1Reliable structured output, large context
Math / LogicDeepSeek R1Deep chain-of-thought reasoning
Research analysisGemini 2.5 Pro1M context for large document sets
ClassificationGemini 2.5 Flash / GPT-4.1 miniCheap and fast for high volume

Multimodal

TaskRecommendedWhy
Image understandingGPT-4o / Gemini 2.5 ProNative vision capabilities
Document OCRGemini 2.5 ProHandles PDFs and scanned docs well
Audio transcriptionGPT-4oNative audio input support

โšก Speed vs Quality Tiers

Tier 1 โ€” Maximum Quality (slower, higher cost)
โ”œโ”€โ”€ Claude 4 Sonnet (extended thinking)
โ”œโ”€โ”€ Gemini 2.5 Pro (thinking mode)
โ””โ”€โ”€ DeepSeek R1

Tier 2 โ€” Balanced (good quality, reasonable speed)
โ”œโ”€โ”€ Claude 3.7 Sonnet
โ”œโ”€โ”€ GPT-4.1
โ””โ”€โ”€ GPT-4o

Tier 3 โ€” Fast & Cheap (high throughput)
โ”œโ”€โ”€ Claude 3.5 Haiku
โ”œโ”€โ”€ Gemini 2.5 Flash
โ”œโ”€โ”€ GPT-4.1 mini
โ””โ”€โ”€ DeepSeek V3

๐Ÿ’ฐ Cost Efficiency Ranking

For typical workloads (mixed input/output), approximate cost per 1M total tokens:

RankModel~Cost per 1M tokensQuality
1Gemini 2.5 Flash~$0.40Good
2GPT-4.1 mini~$1.00Good
3DeepSeek V3~$0.70Very Good
4Claude 3.5 Haiku~$2.40Very Good
5DeepSeek R1~$1.40Excellent (reasoning)
6GPT-4.1~$5.00Excellent
7Gemini 2.5 Pro~$6.00Excellent
8Claude 4 Sonnet~$9.00Top tier

๐Ÿ”ง Quick Start: Access All Models with One API

Instead of managing separate API keys for each provider, you can use an API gateway to access all models through a single OpenAI-compatible endpoint.

Example with Python (OpenAI SDK):

python
from openai import OpenAI

# Works with any OpenAI-compatible gateway
client = OpenAI(
    api_key="your-api-key",
    base_url="https://your-gateway.com/v1"  
)

# Switch models by just changing the model name
models = [
    "claude-sonnet-4-20250514",
    "gpt-4.1",
    "gemini-2.5-pro-preview-05-06",
    "deepseek-chat",
]

for model in models:
    response = client.chat.completions.create(
        model=model,
        messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Explain quicksort in 3 sentences"}],
    )
    print(f"{model}: {response.choices[0].message.content[:100]}...")

Popular API gateways: Crazyrouter, OpenRouter, AIHubMix

๐Ÿ“ˆ Key Trends โ€” May 2026

  1. 1.Extended thinking is mainstream โ€” Claude 4 Sonnet, Gemini 2.5 Pro, and DeepSeek R1 all support chain-of-thought reasoning modes
  2. 2.1M+ context is the new normal โ€” GPT-4.1, Gemini 2.5, and Llama 4 all support 1M tokens
  3. 3.Open-source closing the gap โ€” Qwen3, Llama 4, and DeepSeek V3 rival proprietary models
  4. 4.Prices keep dropping โ€” Flash/mini tiers make AI accessible for high-volume production use
  5. 5.Multimodal expanding โ€” Vision, audio, and video understanding becoming standard features

๐Ÿ“š Methodology

This comparison is based on:

  • โ€”Official API documentation and pricing pages
  • โ€”Public benchmarks (LMSYS Chatbot Arena, LiveBench, SWE-bench)
  • โ€”Community feedback and real-world usage reports
  • โ€”Our own testing across coding, writing, and analysis tasks

We update this guide monthly. Prices and capabilities change frequently โ€” always check the provider's official docs for the latest info.

๐Ÿค Contributing

Found outdated info or want to add a model? PRs are welcome! Please include:

  • โ€”Source link for any pricing or capability claims
  • โ€”Date of verification

๐Ÿ“– Related Resources


โญ Star this repo if you find it useful โ€” it helps others discover it!