yuriyvnv/whisper-tiny-high-mixed-pt

Whisper-Tiny Portuguese - High-Quality Filtered Synthetic Data (Best Tiny Configuration)

This model is a fine-tuned version of openai/whisper-tiny for Portuguese automatic speech recognition (ASR). It was trained on Common Voice 17.0 Portuguese combined with WAVe-filtered high-quality synthetic speech data using a strict threshold (q ≥ 0.8).

Purpose

This model represents the best configuration for Whisper-Tiny Portuguese, achieving a 1.39 percentage point improvement over the CV-only baseline. However, the paper emphasizes that this gain is modest:

"The Portuguese Whisper-Tiny model achieves its lowest test WER of 29.33% using the high-quality filtered subset, an improvement of just 1.39 percentage points over the Common Voice baseline of 30.72%. This modest gain offers limited justification for the additional data filtering and preprocessing overhead."

This model demonstrates that while high-quality filtering provides the best results for Tiny, the improvement is marginal compared to the dramatic gains seen with Large-v3 models (+32.6%).

Model Details

Evaluation Results

This Model (whisper-tiny-high-mixed-pt)

Comparison with Other Training Configurations (Whisper-Tiny Portuguese)

Key Performance Highlights

• —Best Tiny configuration: Lowest Test WER (29.33%) and MLS WER (44.18%)
• —Modest improvement: Only 1.39% better than baseline on in-domain
• —Best cross-domain: 44.18% MLS WER (best among Tiny configurations)
• —Quality threshold matters: Strict q ≥ 0.8 filtering provides best results for Tiny

Tiny vs Large: Synthetic Data Impact

The contrast with Large-v3 models illustrates the architectural capacity limitation:

For Large-v3, high-quality synthetic data reduces WER by 32.6%. For Tiny, the same approach yields only 4.5% relative improvement.

Training Data

Dataset Composition

WAVe Quality Distribution (Portuguese Synthetic Data)

This strict threshold retains only the top 33.3% of synthetic samples, which proves optimal for Tiny models that cannot handle noisier data.

Training Procedure

Hyperparameters

Training Infrastructure

• —GPU: NVIDIA H200 (140GB VRAM)
• —Operating System: Ubuntu 22.04
• —Framework: Hugging Face Transformers

Usage

Transcription Pipeline

from transformers import pipeline

transcriber = pipeline(
    "automatic-speech-recognition",
    model="yuriyvnv/whisper-tiny-high-mixed-pt",
    device="cuda"
)

result = transcriber("path/to/portuguese_audio.wav")
print(result["text"])

Direct Model Usage

from transformers import WhisperProcessor, WhisperForConditionalGeneration
import librosa

processor = WhisperProcessor.from_pretrained("yuriyvnv/whisper-tiny-high-mixed-pt")
model = WhisperForConditionalGeneration.from_pretrained("yuriyvnv/whisper-tiny-high-mixed-pt")
model.to("cuda")

audio, sr = librosa.load("path/to/portuguese_audio.wav", sr=16000)
input_features = processor(audio, sampling_rate=16000, return_tensors="pt").input_features.to("cuda")

predicted_ids = model.generate(input_features)
transcription = processor.batch_decode(predicted_ids, skip_special_tokens=True)[0]
print(transcription)

Specifying Language

model.generation_config.language = "pt"
model.generation_config.task = "transcribe"

When to Use This Model

This model is ideal when:

• —Best Tiny accuracy needed: 29.33% WER (best among Tiny configurations)
• —Resource-constrained deployment: 39M parameters for edge devices
• —Cross-domain robustness for Tiny: Best MLS performance (44.18%)
• —Quality-filtered augmentation available: Have WAVe-scored synthetic data

Consider alternatives based on your needs:

• —whisper-tiny-cv-only-pt: Simpler setup, only 1.39% worse
• —whisper-small-cv-only-pt: Better accuracy (13.87% WER)
• —whisper-large-v3-high-mixed-pt: Best overall (7.94% WER)

Research Implications

This model demonstrates an important finding:

High-quality filtering is necessary but not sufficient for smaller models.

For Tiny models:

• —Quality filtering (q ≥ 0.8) is the only configuration that helps
• —Mid-high quality (q ≥ 0.5) actually hurts performance vs baseline
• —Unfiltered data provides worse results than strict filtering
• —The improvement is marginal regardless of filtering quality

Recommendation: For resource-constrained deployments, the baseline CV-only model may be more practical given the marginal 1.39% improvement doesn't justify the additional preprocessing complexity.

Limitations

• —Lower accuracy than larger models: 29.33% vs 7.94% (Large-v3)
• —Marginal improvement over baseline: Only 1.39 percentage points
• —Limited capacity: Cannot fully leverage synthetic data benefits
• —Domain specificity: Optimized for general Portuguese
• —Dialect coverage: Performance may vary across Portuguese regional variants

Citation

This model is part of research on WAVe (Word-Aligned Verification) for synthetic speech quality assessment. While the WAVe methodology paper is currently under review, please cite our previous work that motivated this research:

@article{perezhohin2024enhancing,
  title={Enhancing Automatic Speech Recognition: Effects of Semantic Audio Filtering on Models Performance},
  author={Perezhohin, Yuriy and Santos, Tiago and Costa, Victor and Peres, Fernando and Castelli, Mauro},
  journal={IEEE Access},
  year={2024},
  publisher={IEEE}
}
@article{perezhohin2026wave,
  title={WAVe: Word-aligned verification of synthetic speech for ASR},
  author={Perezhohin, Yuriy and Castelli, Mauro},
  journal={Information Sciences},
  pages={123591},
  year={2026},
  publisher={Elsevier}
}

References

• —Base Model: openai/whisper-tiny
• —Training Data (Real): mozilla-foundation/common_voice_17_0
• —Training Data (Synthetic): yuriyvnv/synthetic_transcript_pt
• —Whisper Paper: Robust Speech Recognition via Large-Scale Weak Supervision
• —Motivating Research: Enhancing ASR with Semantic Audio Filtering (IEEE Access 2024)

License

Apache 2.0