CoolFace
Modelpublic

unum-cloud/uform-vl-english-small-gpu-fp16

sourceHugging Faceapache-2.0updated 2y agoView on Hugging Face
0likes15downloads
Model Card

<h1 align="center">UForm</h1> <h3 align="center"> Multi-Modal Inference Library<br/> For Semantic Search Applications<br/> </h3>


UForm is a Multi-Modal Modal Inference package, designed to encode Multi-Lingual Texts, Images, and, soon, Audio, Video, and Documents, into a shared vector space!

This is model card of the _English only model_ with:

  • —4 layers BERT (2 layers for unimodal encoding and rest layers for multimodal encoding)
  • —ViT-S/16 (image resolution is 224x224)

If you need Multilingual model, check this.

Evaluation

The following metrics were obtained with multimodal re-ranking (text-to-image retrieval):

DatasetRecall@1Recall@5Recall@10
Zero-Shot Flickr0.5650.7900.860
Zero-Shot MS-COCO0.2810.5250.645

ImageNet-Top1: 0.361 \ ImageNet-Top5: 0.608

Installation

bash
pip install uform[onnx-gpu]

Usage

To load the model:

python
import uform

model, processor = uform.get_model_onnx('unum-cloud/uform-vl-english-small', device='gpu', dtype='fp16')

To encode data:

python
from PIL import Image

text = 'a small red panda in a zoo'
image = Image.open('red_panda.jpg')

image_data = processor.preprocess_image(image)
text_data = processor.preprocess_text(text)

image_features, image_embedding = model.encode_image(image_data, return_features=True)
text_features, text_embedding = model.encode_text(text_data, return_features=True)
score, joint_embedding = model.encode_multimodal(
    image_features=image_features,
    text_features=text_features,
    attention_mask=text_data['attention_mask'],
    return_scores=True
)

There are two options to calculate semantic compatibility between an image and a text: cosine similarity and Matching Score.

Cosine Similarity

The similarity will belong to the [-1, 1] range, 1 meaning the absolute match.

_Pros_:

  • —Computationally cheap.
  • —Only unimodal embeddings are required, unimodal encoding is faster than joint encoding.
  • —Suitable for retrieval in large collections.

_Cons_:

  • —Takes into account only coarse-grained features.

Matching Score

Unlike cosine similarity, unimodal embedding are not enough. Joint embedding will be needed and the resulting score will belong to the [0, 1] range, 1 meaning the absolute match.

_Pros_:

  • —Joint embedding captures fine-grained features.
  • —Suitable for re-ranking – sorting retrieval result.

_Cons_:

  • —Resource-intensive.
  • —Not suitable for retrieval in large collections.