CoolFace
Modelpublic

nlproj/gated_deltanet_350M_rfull_bs256_lr3e-4_steps10000

sourceHugging Faceapache-2.0updated 5mo agoView on Hugging Face
0likes82downloads
Model Card

GatedDeltaNet 350M (full rank) — Low-rank Fast-Weight Ablation

Pretrained 350M-parameter GatedDeltaNet with low-rank parameterization (rfull) on FineWeb-Edu. Part of a multi-cell ablation across 4 archs × {r32, r64, r256, rfull} (plus GDN extras r512) studying whether constraining the q/k/v fast-weight projections (or LaCT's SwiGLU MLP) to low rank can match or exceed full-rank performance at the 350M scale.

Training

ArchitectureGatedDeltaNet
Rankrfull
Params~350M (hidden=1024, layers=24, heads=16)
DatasetHuggingFaceFW/fineweb-edu (streaming)
Steps10000
Effective batch256
Sequence length8000
OptimizerAdamW (lr=3e-4, eps=1e-15)
LR scheduleCosine, 512-step warmup, decay to 10%
Precisionbf16
Activation checkpointingselective (option 1)
Tokens~20.5 B

Eval results

  • —FineWeb-Edu val PPL: 12.21
  • —LAMBADA acc: 0.315
  • —HellaSwag acc_norm: 0.401
  • —ARC-Easy acc_norm: 0.509
  • —ARC-Challenge acc_norm: 0.270
  • —PIQA acc_norm: 0.662
  • —WinoGrande acc: 0.510

Notes on the 350M sweep

  • —Downstream eval discrimination comes online at 350M. At 100M, HellaSwag / LAMBADA were near-chance for most cells; at 350M they discriminate clearly between archs/ranks.
  • —PPL doesn't linearly predict downstream. At matched ~374M, GLA rfull has worse FineWeb-Edu PPL than DeltaNet rfull (14.42 vs 12.55) but wins on every lm-harness task (LAMBADA, HellaSwag, PIQA, ARC-E).
  • —GatedDeltaNet dominates at the cost of size. GDN rfull is ~526M (head_dim=256 inflates q/k/v) and wins every metric; GDN r256 (~432M) is the matched-param comparison and still leads.
  • —LaCT is rank-robust at 350M. PPL/LAMBADA stay flat across r64 / r256 / rfull — the cleanest evidence for the "low rank as regularization" hypothesis.

Run name: gated_deltanet_350M_rfull_bs256_lr3e-4_steps10000