Modelpublic

mradermacher/KitchenSink_103b-i1-GGUF

sourceHugging Facellama2updated 2y agoView on Hugging Face

1likes2kdownloads

Model Card

weighted/imatrix quants of https://huggingface.co/MarsupialAI/KitchenSink_103b

static quants are available at https://huggingface.co/mradermacher/KitchenSink_103b-GGUF

If you are unsure how to use GGUF files, refer to one of TheBloke's READMEs for more details, including on how to concatenate multi-part files.

(sorted by size, not necessarily quality. IQ-quants are often preferable over similar sized non-IQ quants)

Link	Type	Size/GB	Notes
GGUF	i1-IQ1_S	22.1	for the desperate
GGUF	i1-IQ1_M	24.2	mostly desperate
GGUF	i1-IQ2_XXS	27.7
GGUF	i1-IQ2_XS	30.8
GGUF	i1-IQ2_S	32.3
GGUF	i1-IQ2_M	35.1
GGUF	i1-Q2_K	38.3	IQ3_XXS probably better
GGUF	i1-IQ3_XXS	40.0	lower quality
GGUF	i1-IQ3_XS	42.6
GGUF	i1-Q3KS	44.9	IQ3_XS probably better
GGUF	i1-IQ3_S	45.0	beats Q3_K*
GGUF	i1-IQ3_M	46.5
PART 1 PART 2	i1-Q3KM	50.0	IQ3_S probably better
PART 1 PART 2	i1-Q3KL	54.5	IQ3_M probably better
PART 1 PART 2	i1-IQ4_XS	55.5
PART 1 PART 2	i1-Q4_0	58.8	fast, low quality
PART 1 PART 2	i1-Q4KS	59.0	optimal size/speed/quality
PART 1 PART 2	i1-Q4KM	62.3	fast, recommended
PART 1 PART 2	i1-Q5KS	71.4
PART 1 PART 2	i1-Q5KM	73.3
PART 1 PART 2	i1-Q6_K	85.1	practically like static Q6_K

Here is a handy graph by ikawrakow comparing some lower-quality quant types (lower is better):

And here are Artefact2's thoughts on the matter: https://gist.github.com/Artefact2/b5f810600771265fc1e39442288e8ec9

See https://huggingface.co/mradermacher/model_requests for some answers to questions you might have and/or if you want some other model quantized.

I thank my company, nethype GmbH, for letting me use its servers and providing upgrades to my workstation to enable this work in my free time.