jtmuller/roadside-gemma-e2b
Roadside Gemma — E2B fine-tune for CDL pre-trip inspections
A LoRA fine-tune of `unsloth/gemma-4-E2B-it` that turns the base model into a voice-driven copilot for commercial-driver pre-trip vehicle inspections.
The model runs fully on-device on a modern Android/iOS phone via `flutter_gemma` and the LiteRT runtime — no network required, which matters because most truck yards and pre-trip inspection sites are cellular dead zones.
Built for the Gemma 4 Impact Challenge (May 2026). Project repo: github.com/jtmuller5/roadside-gemma.
What's in this repo
The 9.6 GB merged BF16 is reproducible by merging the LoRA — omitted to keep the repo lean.
What the model actually does
The model is an agent with seven tools and a strict JSON tool-calling contract. It guides the driver step-by-step through the 7-category / 54-item canonical pre-trip inspection (cab, engine, brakes, lights, tires, trailer, coupling) and records OK / defect outcomes.
Tools surfaced to the model:
get_next_step()— advance the inspectionquery_inspection_item(step, item)— return DOT inspection criteriamark_item_ok(step, item)— record a passing itemrecord_defect(step, item, severity, description)— record a defectcomplete_inspection()— finalize and sign off- (plus refusal / clarification turns with no tool call)
The training corpus enforces a canonical (step, item) keyset; the model is trained to refuse off-topic asks and to ask for clarification rather than hallucinate a tool call.
Evaluation
30 hand-crafted prompts across 6 categories (5 each). Scored against expected tool name + key args. "Hard fail" = wrong/no tool when one was required. "Soft fail" = right tool, wrong arg (e.g. wrong side of vehicle).
With the production app-injected opener ("Now checking <Item>. ...") in context. No-context eval (worst case): 17 / 30, HF=4.
Remaining soft fails are mostly wrong-side args on dual-sided items (passenger_side vs driver_side).
The training journey (why two-factor matters)
v1 of this model failed hard (2/30 pass) and the debugging path is worth documenting because two independent bugs combined to make it look like one:
- Loss-mask bug. The initial training run computed loss over the full sequence including the ~700-token system prompt. With 173 rows sharing one prompt, the model "converged" by memorizing the prompt while never fitting the assistant tool-call tokens. Fixed by switching to
unsloth.chat_templates.train_on_responses_only. - Corpus pollution. The 31B teacher model used to synthesize the corpus hallucinated tool-call keys: 78 distinct
(step, item)pairs in the data vs. 54 canonical pairs. 46 / 173 rows (27%) were polluted. Fixed by embedding the canonical catalog in the synthesis prompt and adding avalidate_conversation()step that drops any row referencing a non-canonical pair. - Missing refusal data. Even the clean v3 corpus had zero examples of "user asks something off-topic." The model called a tool every time because it had never seen what not calling one looked like. Fixed by adding Cat 8 to the synthesis pipeline: 40 conversations across ambiguity, off-topic, uncertainty, greetings, and acknowledgments — all producing text responses with no tool call.
Each fix in isolation was insufficient. v4 = all three.
Training recipe
- Base:
unsloth/gemma-4-E2B-it - Framework: Unsloth + TRL
SFTTrainer - Adapter: LoRA r=128, α=128, dropout=0
- Target modules:
q_proj,k_proj,v_proj,o_proj,gate_proj,up_proj,down_proj - Loss mask:
train_on_responses_only(assistant turns only) - Schedule: 8 epochs, cosine LR 1e-4, batchsize=4 × gradaccum=2 (effective 8)
- Corpus: 380 synthetic conversations across 8 categories (340 task + 40 refusal), all teacher-generated against the canonical 54-item keyset
- Hardware: 1× RTX 5090 (32 GB VRAM)
- Final train loss: 0.155 mean (final batches ~0.01)
Deployment
Android / iOS via flutter_gemma
import 'package:flutter_gemma/flutter_gemma.dart';
final gemma = FlutterGemmaPlugin.instance;
await gemma.modelManager.setModelPath('<path>/model.litertlm');
final session = await gemma.createModel(/* ... */);The .litertlm is quantized dynamic_wi8_afp32 — the ship recipe per the `flutter_gemma` notes. Recipes that quantize the LoRA matrices (e.g. wi4 at rank-128) erase the fine-tune.
PyTorch via PEFT
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
from peft import PeftModel
base = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("unsloth/gemma-4-E2B-it")
tok = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("unsloth/gemma-4-E2B-it")
model = PeftModel.from_pretrained(base, "jtmuller/roadside-gemma-e2b",
subfolder="lora-adapter")Limitations & honest disclosure
- Domain-narrow. This is a pre-trip inspection agent, not a general assistant. It will try to interpret most utterances as part of the inspection flow.
- English only. Corpus is monolingual.
- Dual-sided items are still soft. Expect occasional wrong-side args on tires, mirrors, lights.
- Synthetic corpus. All training data is teacher-generated, not real driver transcripts. The Cat 5 (STT-noisy) category models speech recognition artifacts but isn't a substitute for real STT data.
- Safety scope. This model assists with the inspection workflow. It does not replace a qualified driver's judgment about whether a vehicle is safe to operate.
License
- LoRA adapter and
.litertlm: released under the Gemma Terms of Use. - Synthesis prompts and code in the project repo: MIT.
