digo-prayudha/test-modernbert-embed-base-legal-matryoshka-2
ModernBERT Embed base Legal Matryoshka
This is a sentence-transformers model finetuned from nomic-ai/modernbert-embed-base on the json dataset. It maps sentences & paragraphs to a 768-dimensional dense vector space and can be used for semantic textual similarity, semantic search, paraphrase mining, text classification, clustering, and more.
Model Details
Model Description
- Model Type: Sentence Transformer
- Base model: nomic-ai/modernbert-embed-base <!-- at revision d556a88e332558790b210f7bdbe87da2fa94a8d8 -->
- Maximum Sequence Length: 8192 tokens
- Output Dimensionality: 768 dimensions
- Similarity Function: Cosine Similarity
- Training Dataset:
- json
- Language: en
- License: apache-2.0
Model Sources
- Documentation: Sentence Transformers Documentation
- Repository: Sentence Transformers on GitHub
- Hugging Face: Sentence Transformers on Hugging Face
Full Model Architecture
SentenceTransformer(
(0): Transformer({'max_seq_length': 8192, 'do_lower_case': False, 'architecture': 'ModernBertModel'})
(1): Pooling({'word_embedding_dimension': 768, 'pooling_mode_cls_token': False, 'pooling_mode_mean_tokens': True, 'pooling_mode_max_tokens': False, 'pooling_mode_mean_sqrt_len_tokens': False, 'pooling_mode_weightedmean_tokens': False, 'pooling_mode_lasttoken': False, 'include_prompt': True})
(2): Normalize()
)Usage
Direct Usage (Sentence Transformers)
First install the Sentence Transformers library:
pip install -U sentence-transformersThen you can load this model and run inference.
from sentence_transformers import SentenceTransformer
# Download from the 🤗 Hub
model = SentenceTransformer("digo-prayudha/test-modernbert-embed-base-legal-matryoshka-2")
# Run inference
sentences = [
'are “broad and vague descriptions” of the information that make it impossible for the Court to \nconduct its requisite de novo review over the Department’s decision to withhold this information \nas “critical infrastructure security information.” See Prop. of the People, Inc. v. Off. of Mgmt. & \nBudget, 330 F. Supp. 3d 373, 388 (D.D.C. 2018).',
'What type of review is the Court unable to conduct due to broad and vague descriptions?',
'What did the court express skepticism about?',
]
embeddings = model.encode(sentences)
print(embeddings.shape)
# [3, 768]
# Get the similarity scores for the embeddings
similarities = model.similarity(embeddings, embeddings)
print(similarities)
# tensor([[1.0000, 0.4837, 0.0878],
# [0.4837, 1.0000, 0.3375],
# [0.0878, 0.3375, 1.0000]])<!--
Direct Usage (Transformers)
<details><summary>Click to see the direct usage in Transformers</summary>
</details> -->
<!--
Downstream Usage (Sentence Transformers)
You can finetune this model on your own dataset.
<details><summary>Click to expand</summary>
</details> -->
<!--
Out-of-Scope Use
List how the model may foreseeably be misused and address what users ought not to do with the model. -->
Evaluation
Metrics
Information Retrieval
- Dataset:
dim_768 - Evaluated with <code>InformationRetrievalEvaluator</code> with these parameters:
{
"truncate_dim": 768
}Information Retrieval
- Dataset:
dim_512 - Evaluated with <code>InformationRetrievalEvaluator</code> with these parameters:
{
"truncate_dim": 512
}Information Retrieval
- Dataset:
dim_256 - Evaluated with <code>InformationRetrievalEvaluator</code> with these parameters:
{
"truncate_dim": 256
}Information Retrieval
- Dataset:
dim_128 - Evaluated with <code>InformationRetrievalEvaluator</code> with these parameters:
{
"truncate_dim": 128
}Information Retrieval
- Dataset:
dim_64 - Evaluated with <code>InformationRetrievalEvaluator</code> with these parameters:
{
"truncate_dim": 64
}<!--
Bias, Risks and Limitations
What are the known or foreseeable issues stemming from this model? You could also flag here known failure cases or weaknesses of the model. -->
<!--
Recommendations
What are recommendations with respect to the foreseeable issues? For example, filtering explicit content. -->
Training Details
Training Dataset
json
- Dataset: json
- Size: 5,822 training samples
- Columns: <code>positive</code> and <code>anchor</code>
- Approximate statistics based on the first 1000 samples: | | positive | anchor | |:--------|:------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|:----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | type | string | string | | details | <ul><li>min: 26 tokens</li><li>mean: 97.49 tokens</li><li>max: 160 tokens</li></ul> | <ul><li>min: 8 tokens</li><li>mean: 16.58 tokens</li><li>max: 41 tokens</li></ul> |
- Samples: | positive | anchor | |:-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|:-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | <code>policy” or “are in fact properly classified pursuant to such Executive order” are exempt from <br>production under the FOIA. See 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(1). “[I]n the FOIA context, [the D.C. Circuit <br>has] consistently deferred to executive affidavits predicting harm to the national security, and <br>have found it unwise to undertake searching judicial review.” Ctr. for Nat’l Sec. Studies, 331</code> | <code>What has the D.C. Circuit consistently deferred to in the FOIA context?</code> | | <code>42 The plaintiff states in its briefing that it challenges the CIA’s withholding of two records, in part, in No. 11-443, <br>see Pl.’s First 443 Opp’n at 14, and six documents, in part, in No. 11-444, see Pl.’s First 444 Opp’n at 30, 35. The <br>plaintiff does not specify, however, exactly which Exemption 3 withholdings it challenges in No. 11-445, where the</code> | <code>How many records does the plaintiff challenge the withholding of in part in No. 11-443?</code> | | <code>let alone as a vexing subject of intense legal debate. <br>¶ 46 <br> <br>Indeed, the question of anonymity has taken on increased significance as court records <br>have become readily available to the general public through even casual Internet searches. As <br>the appellant notes in his brief, a Google search of a litigant’s name can produce an untold</code> | <code>In which paragraph is the issue of anonymity discussed?</code> |
- Loss: <code>MatryoshkaLoss</code> with these parameters:
{
"loss": "MultipleNegativesRankingLoss",
"matryoshka_dims": [
768,
512,
256,
128,
64
],
"matryoshka_weights": [
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
],
"n_dims_per_step": -1
}Training Hyperparameters
Non-Default Hyperparameters
eval_strategy: epochper_device_train_batch_size: 32per_device_eval_batch_size: 16gradient_accumulation_steps: 16learning_rate: 2e-05num_train_epochs: 4lr_scheduler_type: cosinewarmup_ratio: 0.1bf16: Trueload_best_model_at_end: Truebatch_sampler: no_duplicates
All Hyperparameters
<details><summary>Click to expand</summary>
overwrite_output_dir: Falsedo_predict: Falseeval_strategy: epochprediction_loss_only: Trueper_device_train_batch_size: 32per_device_eval_batch_size: 16per_gpu_train_batch_size: Noneper_gpu_eval_batch_size: Nonegradient_accumulation_steps: 16eval_accumulation_steps: Nonetorch_empty_cache_steps: Nonelearning_rate: 2e-05weight_decay: 0.0adam_beta1: 0.9adam_beta2: 0.999adam_epsilon: 1e-08max_grad_norm: 1.0num_train_epochs: 4max_steps: -1lr_scheduler_type: cosinelr_scheduler_kwargs: {}warmup_ratio: 0.1warmup_steps: 0log_level: passivelog_level_replica: warninglog_on_each_node: Truelogging_nan_inf_filter: Truesave_safetensors: Truesave_on_each_node: Falsesave_only_model: Falserestore_callback_states_from_checkpoint: Falseno_cuda: Falseuse_cpu: Falseuse_mps_device: Falseseed: 42data_seed: Nonejit_mode_eval: Falseuse_ipex: Falsebf16: Truefp16: Falsefp16_opt_level: O1half_precision_backend: autobf16_full_eval: Falsefp16_full_eval: Falsetf32: Nonelocal_rank: 0ddp_backend: Nonetpu_num_cores: Nonetpu_metrics_debug: Falsedebug: []dataloader_drop_last: Falsedataloader_num_workers: 0dataloader_prefetch_factor: Nonepast_index: -1disable_tqdm: Falseremove_unused_columns: Truelabel_names: Noneload_best_model_at_end: Trueignore_data_skip: Falsefsdp: []fsdp_min_num_params: 0fsdp_config: {'minnumparams': 0, 'xla': False, 'xlafsdpv2': False, 'xlafsdpgrad_ckpt': False}fsdp_transformer_layer_cls_to_wrap: Noneaccelerator_config: {'splitbatches': False, 'dispatchbatches': None, 'evenbatches': True, 'useseedablesampler': True, 'nonblocking': False, 'gradientaccumulationkwargs': None}parallelism_config: Nonedeepspeed: Nonelabel_smoothing_factor: 0.0optim: adamwtorchfusedoptim_args: Noneadafactor: Falsegroup_by_length: Falselength_column_name: lengthddp_find_unused_parameters: Noneddp_bucket_cap_mb: Noneddp_broadcast_buffers: Falsedataloader_pin_memory: Truedataloader_persistent_workers: Falseskip_memory_metrics: Trueuse_legacy_prediction_loop: Falsepush_to_hub: Falseresume_from_checkpoint: Nonehub_model_id: Nonehub_strategy: every_savehub_private_repo: Nonehub_always_push: Falsehub_revision: Nonegradient_checkpointing: Falsegradient_checkpointing_kwargs: Noneinclude_inputs_for_metrics: Falseinclude_for_metrics: []eval_do_concat_batches: Truefp16_backend: autopush_to_hub_model_id: Nonepush_to_hub_organization: Nonemp_parameters:auto_find_batch_size: Falsefull_determinism: Falsetorchdynamo: Noneray_scope: lastddp_timeout: 1800torch_compile: Falsetorch_compile_backend: Nonetorch_compile_mode: Noneinclude_tokens_per_second: Falseinclude_num_input_tokens_seen: Falseneftune_noise_alpha: Noneoptim_target_modules: Nonebatch_eval_metrics: Falseeval_on_start: Falseuse_liger_kernel: Falseliger_kernel_config: Noneeval_use_gather_object: Falseaverage_tokens_across_devices: Falseprompts: Nonebatch_sampler: no_duplicatesmulti_dataset_batch_sampler: proportionalrouter_mapping: {}learning_rate_mapping: {}
</details>
Training Logs
- The bold row denotes the saved checkpoint.
Framework Versions
- Python: 3.12.11
- Sentence Transformers: 5.1.0
- Transformers: 4.56.1
- PyTorch: 2.8.0+cu126
- Accelerate: 1.10.1
- Datasets: 4.0.0
- Tokenizers: 0.22.0
Citation
BibTeX
Sentence Transformers
@inproceedings{reimers-2019-sentence-bert,
title = "Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks",
author = "Reimers, Nils and Gurevych, Iryna",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing",
month = "11",
year = "2019",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.10084",
}MatryoshkaLoss
@misc{kusupati2024matryoshka,
title={Matryoshka Representation Learning},
author={Aditya Kusupati and Gantavya Bhatt and Aniket Rege and Matthew Wallingford and Aditya Sinha and Vivek Ramanujan and William Howard-Snyder and Kaifeng Chen and Sham Kakade and Prateek Jain and Ali Farhadi},
year={2024},
eprint={2205.13147},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
primaryClass={cs.LG}
}MultipleNegativesRankingLoss
@misc{henderson2017efficient,
title={Efficient Natural Language Response Suggestion for Smart Reply},
author={Matthew Henderson and Rami Al-Rfou and Brian Strope and Yun-hsuan Sung and Laszlo Lukacs and Ruiqi Guo and Sanjiv Kumar and Balint Miklos and Ray Kurzweil},
year={2017},
eprint={1705.00652},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
primaryClass={cs.CL}
}<!--
Glossary
Clearly define terms in order to be accessible across audiences. -->
<!--
Model Card Authors
Lists the people who create the model card, providing recognition and accountability for the detailed work that goes into its construction. -->
<!--
Model Card Contact
Provides a way for people who have updates to the Model Card, suggestions, or questions, to contact the Model Card authors. -->
