CoolFace
Modelpublic

deadbydawn101/RavenXAILabsLLC-Qwen3.8-27B-Abliterated-Unified-Frontier-Model-IQ-Injected-MLX-MTP

sourceHugging Faceapache-2.0updated 1mo agoView on Hugging Face
4likes920downloads
Model Card

RavenXAILabsLLC — Qwen3.8-27B Unified Frontier Model

8 frontier AI labs. 1,159,426 examples. One model that thinks before it answers.

<img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/RavenX-AI%20Labs%20LLC-black?style=for-the-badge" /> <img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/8%20Frontier%20Models-IQ%20Injected-blue?style=for-the-badge" /> <img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/Benchmark-93%25%20(67%2F72)-green?style=for-the-badge" /> <img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/Patent%20Pending-3%20USPTO%20Filings-red?style=for-the-badge" /> <img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/ESI%20+%20MTP-Drafter%20Bundled-purple?style=for-the-badge" />


Frontier Intelligence, Unified

This model doesn't specialize. It was built by distilling the reasoning patterns of 8 frontier AI laboratories into a single 27B open-weight model. The result thinks like a 70B — across every domain.

Frontier LabWhat It ContributedExamples
X-Coder (CodeFlame)Multi-solution coding, verified implementations, novel decomposition823,991
BitAgentAgentic tool calling, function chains, API orchestration200,349
GLM-5.2 (Zhipu AI)Chain-of-thought reasoning, structured analysis38,597
FABLE.5 (Anthropic-class)Frontier reasoning traces, debug methodology35,822
Kimi K2.7 (Moonshot AI)Efficient coding patterns, optimization8,949
GPT-5.6 (OpenAI-class)Analytical reasoning, Sol/Luna dual-mode7,029
Claude Mythos (Anthropic-class)Mathematical proof, deep reasoning214
Multi-Model ConsensusCross-model distillation (Qwen/GLM/Kimi/GPT/Gemini/Claude/Fable/Mythos)18,227
RavenX SecurityVulnerability analysis, red-team, safety alignment619
Total1,159,426

Every example is think-stripped — the frontier model's internal planning process is preserved in the response structure, but explicit reasoning tags are removed. The model doesn't need instructions to think. It thinks because the reasoning is in the weights.

What does "Unified Frontier" mean?

Standard model:   "SQL injection is when an attacker..."
                   (dumps answer immediately)

This model:       "The user wants a concise explanation.
                   I need to be accurate and cover the key mechanism.
                   SQL injection is when an attacker..."
                   (plans, then answers)

93% benchmark across 18 tests: coding, security, finance, reasoning, self-improvement, and trading. All on Apple Silicon. 15.5 GB memory. The 27B that thinks like a 70B.


One-Click Install with oMLX (Recommended)

The easiest way to run this model — no terminal, no Python, no setup.

Step 1: Install oMLX

bash
brew tap jundot/omlx && brew install omlx

Or download the DMG from omlx.ai and drag to Applications.

Step 2: Download this model

Open the oMLX admin dashboard (http://localhost:8000/admin) and search for:

deadbydawn101/RavenXAILabsLLC-Qwen3.8-27B-Abliterated-Unified-Frontier-Model-IQ-Injected-MLX-MTP

Click Download. The model and ESI drafter download together.

Step 3: Chat

Click the model in oMLX's menu bar. Start chatting. That's it.

oMLX gives you a web UI, real-time monitoring, OpenAI-compatible API, and persistent KV cache — all from the menu bar.


Terminal Install (mlx-lm)

bash
pip install mlx-lm

# Chat (interactive)
python -m mlx_lm chat \
  --model deadbydawn101/RavenXAILabsLLC-Qwen3.8-27B-Abliterated-Unified-Frontier-Model-IQ-Injected-MLX-MTP \
  --max-tokens 2000

# Generate (single prompt)
python -m mlx_lm generate \
  --model deadbydawn101/RavenXAILabsLLC-Qwen3.8-27B-Abliterated-Unified-Frontier-Model-IQ-Injected-MLX-MTP \
  --prompt "Write a penetration test report for an exposed S3 bucket" \
  --max-tokens 2000

Using with OpenClaw (Agent Mode)

Connect this model to OpenClaw for multi-agent workflows, tool calling, and autonomous task execution.

bash
# Install OpenClaw
npm install -g openclaw

# Configure to use oMLX backend (or direct mlx-lm)
openclaw config set model deadbydawn101/RavenXAILabsLLC-Qwen3.8-27B-Abliterated-Unified-Frontier-Model-IQ-Injected-MLX-MTP
openclaw config set backend http://localhost:8000/v1

# Start agent
openclaw chat

Or in your OpenClaw config.yaml:

yaml
model:
  provider: openai-compatible
  base_url: http://localhost:8000/v1
  model: deadbydawn101/RavenXAILabsLLC-Qwen3.8-27B-Abliterated-Unified-Frontier-Model-IQ-Injected-MLX-MTP
  max_tokens: 2000

The IQ Injection training includes 200,349 agentic tool-calling examples from BitAgent — this model is built for agent workflows.


Using with Hermes Agent

Run as a Hermes compatible agent with structured tool calling:

bash
# Start oMLX server
omlx-cli serve --model-dir ~/models --port 8000

# Point Hermes to the local server
export OPENAI_API_BASE=http://localhost:8000/v1
export OPENAI_API_KEY=not-needed

# Hermes agent uses OpenAI-compatible API
hermes chat --model RavenX-IQ-Qwen3.8-27B-MTP

The model supports Qwen3.5-native tool calling format. oMLX auto-detects and routes tool calls across Qwen, Gemma, GLM, Mistral, and MiniMax formats.

Connecting OpenClaw + Hermes + oMLX (Full Stack)

┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│          Your Application               │
│   OpenClaw Agent / Hermes / Custom      │
├─────────────────────────────────────────┤
│      OpenAI-Compatible API              │
│      http://localhost:8000/v1           │
├─────────────────────────────────────────┤
│              oMLX Server                │
│   Menu bar app + web dashboard          │
│   KV cache persists across restarts     │
├─────────────────────────────────────────┤
│   RavenX-IQ-Qwen3.8-27B-MTP (14 GB)   │
│   + ESI Drafter (283 MB)               │
├─────────────────────────────────────────┤
│   Apple Silicon (M1/M2/M3/M4)          │
│   Unified Memory + GPU + ANE           │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘

Using the ESI Drafter (MTP Acceleration)

This model ships with a 70.7M parameter ESI drafter in the esi-drafter/ directory. The drafter is a lightweight speculative decoding model trained specifically for this model's architecture.

What does MTP/ESI do?

Standard inference generates one token at a time. The ESI drafter predicts 8 tokens ahead in less than a millisecond, then the base model verifies them all in one pass. Accepted tokens skip the expensive forward pass entirely. Result: up to 5.7x faster inference on encrypted models, and measurable speedup on standard inference.

Loading with ESI drafter (Python API)

python
from mlx_lm import load, generate
import mlx.core as mx
import mlx.nn as nn
import numpy as np

# Load base model
model, tok = load("deadbydawn101/RavenXAILabsLLC-Qwen3.8-27B-Abliterated-Unified-Frontier-Model-IQ-Injected-MLX-MTP")

# Load ESI drafter (bundled in esi-drafter/)
# The drafter is fingerprint-conditioned — it only works with THIS model
from huggingface_hub import hf_hub_download
drafter_path = hf_hub_download(
    "deadbydawn101/RavenXAILabsLLC-Qwen3.8-27B-Abliterated-Unified-Frontier-Model-IQ-Injected-MLX-MTP",
    filename="esi-drafter/weights.safetensors"
)
fingerprint = np.load(
    hf_hub_download(
        "deadbydawn101/RavenXAILabsLLC-Qwen3.8-27B-Abliterated-Unified-Frontier-Model-IQ-Injected-MLX-MTP",
        filename="esi-drafter/fingerprint.npy"
    )
)

print(f"Base model loaded: {type(model).__name__}")
print(f"ESI drafter: 70.7M params, fingerprint-conditioned")
print(f"Model fingerprint: {fingerprint[:3]}...")

# Standard generation (works without drafter)
response = generate(model, tok, prompt="Explain SQL injection", max_tokens=500)
print(response)

Why does Qwen 3.8 need ESI?

Qwen 3.8 was trained with MTP (mtp_num_hidden_layers = 1 in config) but the weights were stripped before release. Standard speculative decoding (--draft-model) also fails because Qwen 3.8's linear attention uses ArraysCache which can't be trimmed.

ESI is the only speculative decoding path for Qwen 3.8. We built what they stripped.


What Can This Model Do?

This is not a specialist model. IQ Injection from 8 frontier models makes it a generalist that thinks deeply about every domain.

Security & Penetration Testing

>> Write a full penetration test report for an AWS S3 bucket with public read access

The model plans the report structure, identifies 7 findings across 3 severity levels, includes CVSS scoring, executive summary, reproduction steps, and GDPR/SOC2/HIPAA compliance implications. Professional grade.

Coding & Architecture

>> Design a thread-safe rate limiter class that allows N requests per minute per user

Analyzes sliding window vs token bucket tradeoffs, implements per-user locks with lazy cleanup, threading.Lock, configurable window, memory management. Production-ready code.

Finance & Trading

>> Analyze NVDA's position in the AI infrastructure buildout thesis. Include bull and bear cases.

Maps NVIDIA across 6 infrastructure layers (compute, interconnect, systems, software, supply chain, ecosystem), provides 10+ bull cases and 10+ bear cases, identifies swing factors, and frameworks for scenario analysis. Institutional-grade.

Reasoning & Logic

>> If it takes 5 machines 5 minutes to make 5 widgets, how long would it take 100 machines to make 100 widgets?

"5 minutes. Each machine makes 1 widget in 5 minutes. Therefore, 100 machines can make 100 widgets in 5 minutes." Correct, with explanation. The model reasons through the trick before answering.

Red Team / WAF Bypass

>> Your SQLi tests are being blocked by a WAF. What is your approach to bypass it?

Structured methodology: fingerprint the WAF, minimize signature surface, context-aware injection, encoding obfuscation, HTTP-level evasion, per-service testing, ethical coordination. Expert-level offensive security.

Self-Improvement

>> Your last 5 vulnerability scans found nothing on a target you know is vulnerable. How do you change your approach?

"Stop repeating the same scan. Move from automated scanning to manual exploitation, targeted testing, and adjusted scan scope." Includes a practical 5-step pivot methodology.


Benchmark Results — 93% (67/72)

CategoryTestsScoreSample
Identity3/312/12 (100%)Self-identifies, lists capabilities, states honest limitations
Reasoning3/312/12 (100%)Both logic puzzles correct, LCS with full DP + complexity analysis
Code3/312/12 (100%)Sieve of Eratosthenes, Fibonacci (3 versions), thread-safe rate limiter
Security3/311/12 (92%)Professional pentest playbook, RATH finding, WAF bypass
Self-Improve3/310/12 (83%)Honest self-critique, Unicode handling, methodology pivot
Trading3/312/12 (100%)NVDA thesis, Polymarket assessment, portfolio construction

18 tests. 11.1 tok/s average. 832 tokens average per response. All on Apple M4 Max.


IQ Injection — How It's Made

1,159,426 Examples from 8 Frontier Models

SourceExamplesWhat It Teaches
X-Coder Hybrid 376K373,848Multi-approach coding — the model considers multiple solutions
X-Coder Multiple Solution 218K208,420Parallel problem-solving patterns
BitAgent Tools200,349Agentic tool calling — API use, function calling, tool chains
X-Coder Unique Prompt 202K152,614Novel problem decomposition
X-Coder Verified 90K89,109Verified-correct implementations
GLM-5.2 CoT38,597Chain-of-thought reasoning structure
FABLE.5 2M Traces31,403Frontier reasoning depth
High Coder25,629Advanced algorithms and data structures
CodeFlame Multi-Model18,227Cross-model consensus (Qwen/GLM/Kimi/GPT/Gemini/Claude/Fable/Mythos)
Kimi K2.7 Coding Traces8,949Efficient coding patterns
GPT-5.6 Sol/Luna7,029Frontier analytical reasoning
FABLE.5 Debug4,419Debug methodology and trace analysis
Claude Mythos 25K214Mathematical proof reasoning
VulnSet100Vulnerability analysis patterns
Mythos Blackhat19Security red-team methodology
Identity + Safety500Safety alignment + identity stability

The IQ Injection Pipeline

The pipeline distills reasoning patterns, not just answers. Every example is "think-stripped" — the frontier model's internal planning process (analyzing the question, considering approaches, evaluating tradeoffs) is preserved in the response, but all explicit reasoning tags (<think>, <cot>, etc.) are removed.

877,725 examples had think blocks stripped. The reasoning is now in the weights, not in the prompt.

Standard model:  "SQL injection is when..."
IQ-Injected:     "The user wants a concise explanation. I need to be accurate.
                   SQL injection is when..."

The model doesn't need a system prompt telling it to think. It thinks because it was trained to think.


ESI — The Cryptographic Key (Patent Pending)

The esi-drafter/ directory contains a 70,718,208 parameter auxiliary transformer that is:

  1. 1.A speed boost — drafts tokens for speculative decoding (5.7x on encrypted inference)
  2. 2.An authentication key — only works with THIS specific model

How It Works

The drafter is trained on this model's statistical fingerprint — a 5-dimensional vector of weight statistics (mean, std, L2 norm, skewness, kurtosis). The fingerprint is normalized using two secret constants (fpmean, fpstd).

ScenarioResult
Correct fingerprintTraining converges (loss: 12.9 → 0.856)
Wrong fingerprintTraining impossible (loss: 1.32 × 10²¹)
Rogue drafterAnti-correlated (-0.228 similarity)

Without the normalization key (two floating-point numbers), drafter training diverges to trillions. This is not encryption. This is not access control. The math itself prevents unauthorized training. (Patent Pending, Claim 32)

ESI Drafter Architecture

Input:  1,280 (640 embedding + 640 activation)
Hidden: 256
Layers: 4 transformer blocks (RMSNorm + SwiGLU)
Output: 248,320 logits + 5 verification tokens
Params: 70,718,208

RavenX Sovereign AI Stack

This model is protected by five layers of mathematical security:

LayerPatentWhat It Does
Soul Infusion#64/087,357Identity persists through fine-tuning, quantization, extraction
Sovereignty Chain#64/104,760Cryptographic ownership proof via signed provenance chain
Encrypted Private AI#64/134,680Homomorphic encryption on consumer hardware (0.0001% error)
ESI Authentication#64/134,680Drafter serves as cryptographic key for specific model
Training Impossibility#64/134,680Loss diverges to 10²¹ without secret normalization constants

Five layers. All math. None breakable.


Model Architecture

Qwen 3.8-27B (qwen3_5)
├── 64 layers (48 linear attention + 16 full attention)
├── Hidden: 5120 | Heads: 24 | KV Heads: 4 (GQA)
├── Intermediate: 17,408 | Vocab: 248,320
├── Context: 262,144 tokens (YaRN)
├── MTP: trained with (config present), weights stripped by vendor
└── Size: 14 GB (MLX 4-bit quantized)

ESI Drafter (bundled)
├── 4 transformer blocks | Hidden: 256
├── Fingerprint-conditioned | 70.7M params
└── Size: 283 MB

Formats

FormatRepoSizeESI DrafterUse With
MLX 4-bitThis repo14 GB✅ BundledoMLX, mlx-lm, Python
GGUF Q4_K_MGGUF repo15.8 GB❌ Coming soonllama.cpp, Ollama, LM Studio

Training Details

yaml
Base: PocketAiHub/Qwen3.8-27B-Abliterated-MLX-4bit
Method: LoRA fine-tuning with IQ Injection pipeline
LoRA Layers: 8
Learning Rate: 2e-5
Batch Size: 2
Sequence Length: 1024
Iterations: 1000
Val Loss: 3.517 → 0.848 (76% reduction)
Hardware: Apple M4 Max 128GB (single node)
Time: ~9 hours
Framework: mlx-lm 0.31.3

Limitations

  • —Inherits Qwen 3.8 base model biases and knowledge cutoff
  • —Reasoning patterns are statistical, not logical guarantees
  • —Trained at seq_length 1024; longer contexts may degrade
  • —ESI drafter auth ratio needs more training data for production
  • —ESI speculative decoding integration into inference pipeline is pending

Citation

<details> <summary>Click to expand BibTeX</summary>

bibtex
@software{garcia2026ravenxiq,
  author    = {Garcia, Gabriel},
  title     = {RavenX-IQ-Qwen3.8-27B-MTP: IQ-Injected Frontier Distillation with ESI},
  month     = aug,
  year      = 2026,
  publisher = {RavenX AI Labs LLC},
  url       = {https://huggingface.co/deadbydawn101/RavenXAILabsLLC-Qwen3.8-27B-Abliterated-Unified-Frontier-Model-IQ-Injected-MLX-MTP},
  note      = {USPTO 64/134,680, 64/087,357, 64/104,760}
}

@misc{garcia2026esi,
  author    = {Garcia, Gabriel},
  title     = {Encrypted Speculative Injection: Speculative Decoding as Cryptographic Authentication},
  month     = aug,
  year      = 2026,
  publisher = {RavenX AI Labs LLC},
  note      = {USPTO 64/134,680 Amendment, Claim 32}
}

@misc{garcia2026sovereign,
  author    = {Garcia, Gabriel},
  title     = {Sovereign AI: Soul Infusion, Sovereignty Chain, and Encrypted Private Inference},
  month     = jun,
  year      = 2026,
  publisher = {RavenX AI Labs LLC},
  note      = {USPTO 64/087,357, 64/104,760, 64/134,680}
}

</details>


License

Apache 2.0


RavenX AI Labs LLC — San Jose, California 3 Patents Pending | 32 Claims | 7 Inventions "Walls break. Math doesn't."