aaa961/modernbert-embed-base-legal-no_MRL_reverse_dataset
ModernBERT Embed Base Legal Fine-tuned
This is a sentence-transformers model finetuned from nomic-ai/modernbert-embed-base on the legal-rag-positives-synthetic dataset. It maps sentences & paragraphs to a 768-dimensional dense vector space and can be used for semantic textual similarity, semantic search, paraphrase mining, text classification, clustering, and more.
Model Details
Model Description
- Model Type: Sentence Transformer
- Base model: nomic-ai/modernbert-embed-base <!-- at revision d556a88e332558790b210f7bdbe87da2fa94a8d8 -->
- Maximum Sequence Length: 8192 tokens
- Output Dimensionality: 768 dimensions
- Similarity Function: Cosine Similarity
- Training Dataset:
- legal-rag-positives-synthetic
- Language: en
- License: apache-2.0
Model Sources
- Documentation: Sentence Transformers Documentation
- Repository: Sentence Transformers on GitHub
- Hugging Face: Sentence Transformers on Hugging Face
Full Model Architecture
SentenceTransformer(
(0): Transformer({'max_seq_length': 8192, 'do_lower_case': False, 'architecture': 'ModernBertModel'})
(1): Pooling({'word_embedding_dimension': 768, 'pooling_mode_cls_token': False, 'pooling_mode_mean_tokens': True, 'pooling_mode_max_tokens': False, 'pooling_mode_mean_sqrt_len_tokens': False, 'pooling_mode_weightedmean_tokens': False, 'pooling_mode_lasttoken': False, 'include_prompt': True})
(2): Normalize()
)Usage
Direct Usage (Sentence Transformers)
First install the Sentence Transformers library:
pip install -U sentence-transformersThen you can load this model and run inference.
from sentence_transformers import SentenceTransformer
# Download from the 🤗 Hub
model = SentenceTransformer("aaa961/modernbert-embed-base-legal-no_MRL_reverse_dataset")
# Run inference
sentences = [
'confidentiality agreement/order, that remain following those discussions. This is a \nfinal report and notice of exceptions shall be filed within three days of the date of \nthis report, pursuant to Court of Chancery Rule 144(d)(2), given the expedited and \nsummary nature of Section 220 proceedings. \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \nRespectfully, \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n/s/ Patricia W. Griffin',
'According to which court rule must the notice of exceptions be filed?',
'decides whether to submit proposals on future procurements, and excluding mentor-protégé JVs \nfrom proposing on a solicitation due to Section 125.9(b)(3)(i) unnecessarily prevents protégés from \naccessing opportunities to grow as a business. SHS MJAR at 22–23; VCH MJAR at 22–23. \nSuch a critique, however, merely highlights Plaintiffs’ disagreement with the SBA’s',
]
embeddings = model.encode(sentences)
print(embeddings.shape)
# [3, 768]
# Get the similarity scores for the embeddings
similarities = model.similarity(embeddings, embeddings)
print(similarities)
# tensor([[1.0000, 0.4959, 0.0333],
# [0.4959, 1.0000, 0.0378],
# [0.0333, 0.0378, 1.0000]])<!--
Direct Usage (Transformers)
<details><summary>Click to see the direct usage in Transformers</summary>
</details> -->
<!--
Downstream Usage (Sentence Transformers)
You can finetune this model on your own dataset.
<details><summary>Click to expand</summary>
</details> -->
<!--
Out-of-Scope Use
List how the model may foreseeably be misused and address what users ought not to do with the model. -->
Evaluation
Metrics
Information Retrieval
- Dataset:
ir_eval - Evaluated with <code>InformationRetrievalEvaluator</code>
<!--
Bias, Risks and Limitations
What are the known or foreseeable issues stemming from this model? You could also flag here known failure cases or weaknesses of the model. -->
<!--
Recommendations
What are recommendations with respect to the foreseeable issues? For example, filtering explicit content. -->
Training Details
Training Dataset
legal-rag-positives-synthetic
- Dataset: legal-rag-positives-synthetic at f11534a
- Size: 11,644 training samples
- Columns: <code>anchor</code> and <code>positive</code>
- Approximate statistics based on the first 1000 samples: | | anchor | positive | |:--------|:-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|:-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | type | string | string | | details | <ul><li>min: 7 tokens</li><li>mean: 57.45 tokens</li><li>max: 160 tokens</li></ul> | <ul><li>min: 8 tokens</li><li>mean: 57.77 tokens</li><li>max: 157 tokens</li></ul> |
- Samples: | anchor | positive | |:-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | <code>What kinds of issues are mentioned in connection with wrongdoing?</code> | <code>mismanagement, waste and wrongdoing – and that it has demonstrated more than a <br>credible basis from which the Court can infer possible mismanagement. It claims <br>DR’s management failed to follow corporate governance mechanics and made <br>critical business decisions without consulting with the Board or stockholders; <br>failed to act with due diligence related to undertaking an ICO and discontinuing</code> | | <code>Project, 504 F.2d at 248 n.15). <br>More, the requirement of “substantial” authority suggests that the entity should be at the <br>“center of gravity in the exercise of administrative power.” Id. at 882 (quoting Lombardo v. <br>Handler, 397 F. Supp. 792, 796 (D.D.C. 1975), aff’d, 546 F.2d 1043 (D.C. Cir. 1976)). On this</code> | <code>What page reference is given for the Lombardo v. Handler case in the aforementioned citation?</code> | | <code>Where can more detailed information regarding redactions be found?</code> | <code>parties specifically with respect to the FOIA request at issue in Count Eighteen of No. 11-444. This is likely <br>because the CIA has previously instituted a categorical policy of indicating the basis for redactions at a document <br>level, rather than a redaction level, as discussed above. See supra Part III.C.2. In light of the Court’s holding that</code> |
- Loss: <code>MultipleNegativesRankingLoss</code> with these parameters:
{
"scale": 20.0,
"similarity_fct": "cos_sim",
"gather_across_devices": false,
"directions": [
"query_to_doc"
],
"partition_mode": "joint",
"hardness_mode": null,
"hardness_strength": 0.0
}Training Hyperparameters
Non-Default Hyperparameters
per_device_train_batch_size: 32num_train_epochs: 4learning_rate: 2e-05lr_scheduler_type: cosinewarmup_steps: 0.1optim: adamwtorchfusedgradient_accumulation_steps: 16bf16: Truetf32: Trueeval_strategy: epochper_device_eval_batch_size: 16load_best_model_at_end: True
All Hyperparameters
<details><summary>Click to expand</summary>
per_device_train_batch_size: 32num_train_epochs: 4max_steps: -1learning_rate: 2e-05lr_scheduler_type: cosinelr_scheduler_kwargs: Nonewarmup_steps: 0.1optim: adamwtorchfusedoptim_args: Noneweight_decay: 0.0adam_beta1: 0.9adam_beta2: 0.999adam_epsilon: 1e-08optim_target_modules: Nonegradient_accumulation_steps: 16average_tokens_across_devices: Truemax_grad_norm: 1.0label_smoothing_factor: 0.0bf16: Truefp16: Falsebf16_full_eval: Falsefp16_full_eval: Falsetf32: Truegradient_checkpointing: Falsegradient_checkpointing_kwargs: Nonetorch_compile: Falsetorch_compile_backend: Nonetorch_compile_mode: Noneuse_liger_kernel: Falseliger_kernel_config: Noneuse_cache: Falseneftune_noise_alpha: Nonetorch_empty_cache_steps: Noneauto_find_batch_size: Falselog_on_each_node: Truelogging_nan_inf_filter: Trueinclude_num_input_tokens_seen: nolog_level: passivelog_level_replica: warningdisable_tqdm: Falseproject: huggingfacetrackio_space_id: trackioeval_strategy: epochper_device_eval_batch_size: 16prediction_loss_only: Trueeval_on_start: Falseeval_do_concat_batches: Trueeval_use_gather_object: Falseeval_accumulation_steps: Noneinclude_for_metrics: []batch_eval_metrics: Falsesave_only_model: Falsesave_on_each_node: Falseenable_jit_checkpoint: Falsepush_to_hub: Falsehub_private_repo: Nonehub_model_id: Nonehub_strategy: every_savehub_always_push: Falsehub_revision: Noneload_best_model_at_end: Trueignore_data_skip: Falserestore_callback_states_from_checkpoint: Falsefull_determinism: Falseseed: 42data_seed: Noneuse_cpu: Falseaccelerator_config: {'splitbatches': False, 'dispatchbatches': None, 'evenbatches': True, 'useseedablesampler': True, 'nonblocking': False, 'gradientaccumulationkwargs': None}parallelism_config: Nonedataloader_drop_last: Falsedataloader_num_workers: 0dataloader_pin_memory: Truedataloader_persistent_workers: Falsedataloader_prefetch_factor: Noneremove_unused_columns: Truelabel_names: Nonetrain_sampling_strategy: randomlength_column_name: lengthddp_find_unused_parameters: Noneddp_bucket_cap_mb: Noneddp_broadcast_buffers: Falseddp_backend: Noneddp_timeout: 1800fsdp: []fsdp_config: {'minnumparams': 0, 'xla': False, 'xlafsdpv2': False, 'xlafsdpgrad_ckpt': False}deepspeed: Nonedebug: []skip_memory_metrics: Truedo_predict: Falseresume_from_checkpoint: Nonewarmup_ratio: Nonelocal_rank: -1prompts: Nonebatch_sampler: batch_samplermulti_dataset_batch_sampler: proportionalrouter_mapping: {}learning_rate_mapping: {}
</details>
Training Logs
- The bold row denotes the saved checkpoint.
Framework Versions
- Python: 3.12.11
- Sentence Transformers: 5.3.0
- Transformers: 5.3.0
- PyTorch: 2.5.1+cu121
- Accelerate: 1.13.0
- Datasets: 4.8.2
- Tokenizers: 0.22.2
Citation
BibTeX
Sentence Transformers
@inproceedings{reimers-2019-sentence-bert,
title = "Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks",
author = "Reimers, Nils and Gurevych, Iryna",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing",
month = "11",
year = "2019",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.10084",
}MultipleNegativesRankingLoss
@misc{oord2019representationlearningcontrastivepredictive,
title={Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Coding},
author={Aaron van den Oord and Yazhe Li and Oriol Vinyals},
year={2019},
eprint={1807.03748},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
primaryClass={cs.LG},
url={https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.03748},
}<!--
Glossary
Clearly define terms in order to be accessible across audiences. -->
<!--
Model Card Authors
Lists the people who create the model card, providing recognition and accountability for the detailed work that goes into its construction. -->
<!--
Model Card Contact
Provides a way for people who have updates to the Model Card, suggestions, or questions, to contact the Model Card authors. -->
