KikoCis/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-IQ2_M-GGUF
2216
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B — IQ2_M (domain imatrix)
Custom IQ2_M quantization of Qwen/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B with a domain-mixed importance matrix calibrated on code + agentic + CLI traces.
- Size: 11.1 GB
- BPW: 2.69
- Architecture: Hybrid GatedDeltaNet + MoE (256 experts, 8+1 active per token, 35B total / 3B active)
- Calibration: domain-mixed imatrix (45% code, 45% agentic/tool-use, 10% general)
Benchmark comparison — Cross-model, cross-architecture
First public HumanEval+/MBPP+/BFCL evaluation of Qwen3.6-35B-A3B quantizations.
Note on BFCL scores: All BFCL scores reported here use our internal simplified evaluation (single-function-call subset with custom prompt/scoring), NOT the official Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard methodology. Our scores are not directly comparable to the official leaderboard. We are working on running the official BFCL evaluation for comparable numbers.
Key findings
- This repo beats Unsloth UD-IQ2_M on BFCL (+0.5pt, 94.75 vs 94.25) — domain-mixed imatrix calibration with 45% agentic traces pays off for tool-calling
- Gemma 4 31B IQ2_M remains king for pure code at 10 GB — HumanEval+ 88.41% is unmatched
- Qwen3.6 MoE efficiency is remarkable: 3B active params at 11 GB scores 94.75% BFCL, competing with 31B dense models
- Sub-8 GB tier: Gemma 4 E4B Q80 (7.8 GB) dominates over the 31B IQ1M (7.4 GB) on every metric — ultra-aggressive quantization of large models loses to small models at full precision
Recommendation by use case
- Best for code (any size): Gemma 4 31B IQ2_M (10.4 GB)
- Best for agentic/tool-calling: This repo — Qwen3.6 IQ2_M (11.1 GB)
- Best sub-8 GB all-rounder: Gemma 4 E4B Q8_0 (7.8 GB)
Quickstart
huggingface-cli download KikoCis/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-IQ2_M-GGUF qwen36-35b-a3b-IQ2_M.gguf --local-dir .
llama-cli -m qwen36-35b-a3b-IQ2_M.gguf -ngl 99 --ctx-size 8192 --temp 0.1 \
-p "Write a Python function to find the longest palindromic substring"Files
qwen36-35b-a3b-IQ2_M.gguf— quantized weights (11.1 GB)qwen36-35b-a3b-domain.imatrix— importance matrix used for calibration
Related
- Gemma 4 31B IQ2_M — best for code
- Full study site
- GitHub
License
Apache 2.0.
Real-World Agent Test Warning (April 2026)
Benchmark scores do not predict agent capability. In Docker-based autonomous testing, fine-tuned E4B models (95% BFCL) scored 0/10 while the unfine-tuned base scored 6/10. Fine-tuning for BFCL destroyed general reasoning (error recovery, strategy adaptation, anti-repetition). Fine-tuned E4B models have been withdrawn. For autonomous agent tasks, use the base Gemma 4 model or a larger model at higher BPW. See: The Benchmark Trap — Full Study
