yu0226/CipherBank
CipherBank Benchmark Benchmark description CipherBank, a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate the reasoning capabilities of LLMs in cryptographic decryption tasks. CipherBank comprises 2,358 meticulously crafted problems, covering 262 unique plaintexts across 5 domains and 14 subdomains, with a focus on privacy-sensitive and real-world scenarios that necessitate encryption. From a cryptographic perspective, CipherBank incorporates 3 major categories of… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/yu0226/CipherBank.
CipherBank Benchmark
Benchmark description
CipherBank, a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate the reasoning capabilities of LLMs in cryptographic decryption tasks. CipherBank comprises 2,358 meticulously crafted problems, covering 262 unique plaintexts across 5 domains and 14 subdomains, with a focus on privacy-sensitive and real-world scenarios that necessitate encryption. From a cryptographic perspective, CipherBank incorporates 3 major categories of encryption methods, spanning 9 distinct algorithms, ranging from classical ciphers to custom cryptographic techniques.
Model Performance
We evaluate state-of-the-art LLMs on CipherBank, e.g., GPT-4o, DeepSeek-V3, and cutting-edge reasoning-focused models such as o1 and DeepSeek-R1. Our results reveal significant gaps in reasoning abilities not only between general-purpose chat LLMs and reasoning-focused LLMs but also in the performance of current reasoning-focused models when applied to classical cryptographic decryption tasks, highlighting the challenges these models face in understanding and manipulating encrypted data.
Please see paper & website for more information:
Citation
If you find CipherBank useful for your research and applications, please cite using this BibTeX:
@misc{li2025cipherbankexploringboundaryllm,
title={CipherBank: Exploring the Boundary of LLM Reasoning Capabilities through Cryptography Challenges},
author={Yu Li and Qizhi Pei and Mengyuan Sun and Honglin Lin and Chenlin Ming and Xin Gao and Jiang Wu and Conghui He and Lijun Wu},
year={2025},
eprint={2504.19093},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
primaryClass={cs.CR},
url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.19093},
}