wckwan/WebShop-Olmo3-7B-Adaptive-Pivot-Fenced-eval-newparser
WebShop OLMo-3-7B-Instruct pivot FENCED: held-out evaluation, NEW action parser Held-out WebShop evaluation rows for wckwan/WebShop-Olmo3-7B-Adaptive-Pivot-Fenced, steps gs140 through gs200. NOT comparable to the gs20–gs120 rows in wckwan/WebShop-Olmo3-7B-Adaptive-Pivot-Fenced-eval. Those ran on the frozen OLD-parser surface 7173787ad6e171c6, which executes the first <action> pair anywhere in the response, including actions rehearsed and rejected inside the reasoning. These… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/wckwan/WebShop-Olmo3-7B-Adaptive-Pivot-Fenced-eval-newparser.
WebShop OLMo-3-7B-Instruct pivot FENCED: held-out evaluation, NEW action parser
Held-out WebShop evaluation rows for `wckwan/WebShop-Olmo3-7B-Adaptive-Pivot-Fenced`, steps gs140 through gs200.
NOT comparable to the gs20–gs120 rows in [`wckwan/WebShop-Olmo3-7B-Adaptive-Pivot-Fenced-eval`](https://huggingface.co/datasets/wckwan/WebShop-Olmo3-7B-Adaptive-Pivot-Fenced-eval). Those ran on the frozen OLD-parser surface7173787ad6e171c6, which executes the first<action>pair anywhere in the response, including actions rehearsed and rejected inside the reasoning. These rows use the NEW parser, andconfig_fingerprintdoes not distinguish the two. The old parser corrupts fenced decisions far more than terse ones, and increasingly with training step, so splicing the two series would create a step change that is pure parser.
Action-parser surface
Every result.json carries the same statement as eval_surface_note. The commit, parser-file hash and rule above are the canonical identification of this surface; no opaque surface id is assigned.
Layout
global_step_N/result.json # metrics, diagnostics, goal set, config, fingerprint, runtime, eval_surface_note
global_step_N/trajectories.jsonl # per-episode trajectories
global_step_N/eval_seed0.log # eval log
MANIFEST.sha256 # sha256sum -c compatibleProtocol
standalone_eval preset webshop_olmo3 (Instruct): 500 goals in 4 shards of 125 (goalindices sha256 `3c6e0c423c7234e8…`, shards `0bc99e5066361073…`), 15 steps, prompt/response 4096/2048, history 2, temperature 0.4, topp 1.0, topk -1, `historyactioncharcap None. Runtime: vLLM 0.11.0, data parallel 2 (TP=1), engine seed 0. Every row passes scripts/checkresultwebshop.py`.
A matching fingerprint here does not imply a matching parser surface; check eval_surface_note / eval_contrast_note.
