lorenzo0312/degeneration-probe-instruct-token-level-balanced
degeneration-probe-instruct-token-level-balanced Downsampled (1:3 positive:negative) variant of luca-sartori/degeneration-probe-instruct-token-level. An example is considered positive if it contains at least one token with repetition >= 0.8 in the chunk_summary field. The downsampling keeps all positive examples and adds a random subset of negative examples in a 1:3 ratio. Examples whose chunk_summary contained no scored tokens (every repetition value null) have been dropped… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/lorenzo0312/degeneration-probe-instruct-token-level-balanced.
degeneration-probe-instruct-token-level-balanced
Downsampled (1:3 positive:negative) variant of `luca-sartori/degeneration-probe-instruct-token-level`.
An example is considered positive if it contains at least one token with repetition >= 0.8 in the chunk_summary field. The downsampling keeps all positive examples and adds a random subset of negative examples in a 1:3 ratio.
Examples whose chunk_summary contained no scored tokens (every repetition value null) have been dropped, since they cannot contribute to training or evaluation (every label maps to the ignore sentinel -100).
Splits
The dropped rows were exclusively negatives generated by swiss-ai/Apertus-8B-Instruct-2509, so the 1:3 pos:neg ratio is no longer preserved after the cleanup (now roughly 1:1.6).
Reproducibility
- Source dataset:
luca-sartori/degeneration-probe-instruct-token-level - Positive threshold:
repetition >= 0.8(any token inchunk_summary) - Ratio (before cleanup): 3 negatives per positive, per split
- Negative sampling:
numpy.random.default_rng(seed=42).choice(..., replace=False) - Cleanup: rows where every entry in
chunk_summaryhasrepetition is Noneare dropped - Schema: identical to the source dataset (16 columns, including
chunk_summary)
Intended use
Use this dataset for faster experimentation when training token-level degeneration probes on the original heavily-imbalanced data (≈1:72 at example level, ≈1:9 at token level) is too slow.
Note that validation and test splits are also downsampled, so metrics on this dataset are not directly comparable to metrics on the full source dataset.
