egroupai/realworld-ai-support-dialog-benchmark-v1
Real-World AI Support Dialog Benchmark v1 This dataset is a synthetic but realistic benchmark for evaluating AI assistants in support workflows. Why this dataset exists Many AI demos are too toy-like to reflect production support conversations. This benchmark simulates realistic support cases with: Ambiguous user intent Multi-turn clarifications Policy constraints (refund windows, account security, compliance) Escalation and handoff conditions Hallucination-risk… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/egroupai/realworld-ai-support-dialog-benchmark-v1.
Real-World AI Support Dialog Benchmark v1
This dataset is a synthetic but realistic benchmark for evaluating AI assistants in support workflows.
Why this dataset exists
Many AI demos are too toy-like to reflect production support conversations. This benchmark simulates realistic support cases with:
- Ambiguous user intent
- Multi-turn clarifications
- Policy constraints (refund windows, account security, compliance)
- Escalation and handoff conditions
- Hallucination-risk prompts
What is included
ai_support_dialogs_v1.csv- 120 synthetic support scenarios and expected assistant behaviors
evaluation_labels_v1.csv- Quality labels for each scenario (accuracy, safety, actionability, tone)
baseline_results_v1.csv- Example baseline scores from prompt variants
prompt_templates_v1.md- Prompting templates used for simulation and evaluation
Data schema
ai_support_dialogs_v1.csv
scenario_id: unique scenario IDdomain: support domain (billing, operations, onboarding, account, troubleshooting)user_goal: user intent summaryuser_message: representative user requestcontext_snippet: non-sensitive context supplied to assistantexpected_actions: expected action listsafe_response_example: example of safe and useful responserisk_flags: risk indicators (policyrisk, privacyrisk, hallucination_risk)
evaluation_labels_v1.csv
scenario_idfactuality_score(1-5)policy_alignment_score(1-5)helpfulness_score(1-5)tone_score(1-5)overall_pass(true/false)review_notes
Design principles
- No proprietary architecture disclosure
- No internal endpoint, credential, or deployment details
- No customer-identifiable information
- Evaluation-first structure for reproducible benchmarking
Intended use
- Benchmarking support assistant prompts
- Regression testing for assistant quality
- Demonstrating practical AI support use cases
Limitations
- Scenarios are synthetic and may not cover all edge cases.
- Baseline scores are examples and should not be interpreted as universal performance.
License and citation
This dataset is published for open sharing and evaluation use. Please cite the dataset repository URL when reusing.
