CoolFace
Datasetpublic

danish-foundation-models/dala

DaLA: Danish Linguistic Acceptability Evaluation Dataset DaLA (paper) is a benchmark dataset for linguistic acceptability judgment in Danish, designed to evaluate how well NLP models, especially large language models (LLMs), understand grammaticality in real-world Danish sentences. The dataset extends previous resources by introducing a broader and more realistic set of error types and providing data splits suitable for evaluation via few-shot or finetuning. πŸ”—β€¦ See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/danish-foundation-models/dala.

sourceHugging Facecc-by-4.0updated 7mo agoView on Hugging Face
0likes75downloads
Dataset Card

DaLA: Danish Linguistic Acceptability Evaluation Dataset

DaLA ([paper][1]) is a benchmark dataset for linguistic acceptability judgment in Danish, designed to evaluate how well NLP models, especially large language models (LLMs), understand grammaticality in real-world Danish sentences. The dataset extends previous resources by introducing a broader and more realistic set of error types and providing data splits suitable for evaluation via few-shot or finetuning.


πŸ”— Links

  • β€”DaLA variants are linked and described below
  • β€”[Paper][1]
  • β€”GitHub Repository (code, data generation scripts)

πŸ“– Overview

In linguistic acceptability tasks, models must distinguish between grammatically acceptable and unacceptable sentences. The DaLA dataset was created by:

  • β€”Analyzing real-world Danish writing errors.
  • β€”Designing 14 distinct corruption functions that reflect common Danish mistakes (e.g., pronoun confusion, suffix errors, interchange of determiners).
  • β€”Applying these corruptions to correct Danish sentences from the Universal Dependencies Danish corpus.
  • β€”Pairing each corrupted sentence with its correct counterpart.

The dataset includes:

  • β€”The original correct sentences (acceptable).
  • β€”The corrupted sentences (unacceptable).
  • β€”A binary acceptability label.
  • β€”A corruption type identifier.

πŸ“¦ Dataset Variants and Splits

There are three variants of the DaLA dataset, each with different sizes and proportions:

Split VariantDescriptionSize (approx.)Link
dalaStandard benchmark with proportions comparable to prior Danish acceptability datasets3,328 samplesDaLA Standard
dala_mediumExpanded version using more available samples~6,056 samplesDaLA Medium
dala_largeLargest version with the full expanded dataset~7,656 samplesDaLA Large

Each variant includes train, validation, and test splits.


🧠 Tasks & Usage

DaLA is primarily intended for:

βœ” Model evaluation and benchmarking: Assessing model competence in grammatical judgment βœ” Minimal-pair evaluation: Error type discrimination and fine-grained analysis

You can load the dataset using the Hugging Face datasets library as follows:

python
from datasets import load_dataset

# Standard split
dataset = load_dataset("giannor/dala")

# Medium or large variants
dataset_medium = load_dataset("giannor/dala_medium")
dataset_large  = load_dataset("giannor/dala_large")

πŸ“Š Baselines & Model Performance

In the corresponding paper, DaLA was used to benchmark a variety of open-source LLMs and model types. Across many models, performance on DaLA was lower than on previous Danish acceptability benchmarks, highlighting DaLA’s greater difficulty and discriminatory power. ([DaLA paper][1])


πŸ“„ Citation

If you use this dataset in your work, please cite the following paper:

bibtex
@misc{barmina2025daladanishlinguisticacceptability,
      title={DaLA: Danish Linguistic Acceptability Evaluation Guided by Real World Errors}, 
      author={Gianluca Barmina and Nathalie Carmen Hau Norman and Peter Schneider-Kamp and Lukas Galke},
      year={2025},
      eprint={2512.04799},
      archivePrefix={arXiv},
      primaryClass={cs.CL},
      url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.04799}, 
}

βš–οΈ License

This dataset is shared under the CC BY 4.0 license.

[1]: https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.04799 "DaLA: Danish Linguistic Acceptability Evaluation Guided by Real World Errors"