danieez/Med-Evidence-2.6k
Med-Evidence-2.6k Med-Evidence-2.6k is a benchmark for evaluating evidence-grounded medical diagnostic reasoning. It was developed as part of the work EviDx: Evidence-Aware Active Diagnosis with Scaffolded LLM Agents, accepted to Findings of EMNLP 2026. The benchmark provides clinical diagnostic questions paired with ground-truth answers and annotated evidence spans, enabling evaluation of both diagnostic accuracy and evidence-grounded reasoning. Dataset Structure… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/danieez/Med-Evidence-2.6k.
Med-Evidence-2.6k
Med-Evidence-2.6k is a benchmark for evaluating evidence-grounded medical diagnostic reasoning. It was developed as part of the work EviDx: Evidence-Aware Active Diagnosis with Scaffolded LLM Agents, accepted to Findings of EMNLP 2026.
The benchmark provides clinical diagnostic questions paired with ground-truth answers and annotated evidence spans, enabling evaluation of both diagnostic accuracy and evidence-grounded reasoning.
Dataset Structure
Med-Evidence-2.6k currently contains three subsets:
- DiagnosisArena
- JAMA
- MedXpertQA-Text
Note: During dataset curation, we selected 234 diagnosis-related cases from MedXpertQA-Text and annotated evidence for this subset.
Each subset is provided as a separate Hugging Face configuration.
from datasets import load_dataset
dataset = load_dataset(
"danieez/Med-Evidence-2.6k",
"DiagnosisArena"
)
print(dataset["test"][0])The other subsets can be loaded by replacing "DiagnosisArena" with "JAMA" or "MedXpertQA-Text".
Data Format
Each example follows a unified schema:
{
"original_id": "Text-107",
"dataset": "MedXpertQA-Text",
"ground_truth_text": "Truncus arteriosus",
"question_text": "A male neonate, aged 2 weeks, ...",
"golden_evidence": [
{
"original_text": "a single S2",
"type": "Inclusion"
},
{
"original_text": "all peripheral pulses are bounding",
"type": "Differentiation"
}
]
}Fields
Intended Use
Med-Evidence-2.6k is intended for research on:
- medical diagnostic reasoning;
- evidence identification and extraction;
- evidence-grounded question answering;
- evaluation of clinical reasoning in large language models.
The dataset supports separate or joint evaluation of diagnostic answer correctness and evidence selection.
