CoolFace
Datasetpublic

NJU-LINK/AVE-Compass-v2

AVE-Compass Project Page | Paper | Evaluation Code AVE-Compass is a benchmark for evaluating instruction-based audio-video editing abilities. It targets realistic editing requests where visual and audio streams are tightly coupled, such as changing a visible event together with its sound, preserving background ambience during visual edits, or editing speech while maintaining audio-visual consistency. This dataset release contains the source videos, edit instruction JSON files… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/NJU-LINK/AVE-Compass-v2.

sourceHugging Facecc-by-nc-4.0updated 2mo agoView on Hugging Face
2likes534downloads
Dataset Card

AVE-Compass

Project Page | Paper | Evaluation Code

AVE-Compass is a benchmark for evaluating instruction-based audio-video editing abilities. It targets realistic editing requests where visual and audio streams are tightly coupled, such as changing a visible event together with its sound, preserving background ambience during visual edits, or editing speech while maintaining audio-visual consistency.

This dataset release contains the source videos, edit instruction JSON files, and checklist JSON files used by AVE-Compass.

[image]

Benchmark Overview

AVE-Compass contains:

  • —145 curated source videos.
  • —196 human-verified audio-video editing instructions.
  • —2,688 fine-grained checklist items for diagnostic evaluation.
  • —28 fine-grained editing operation types.

The benchmark covers four major editing branches:

  • —Joint audio-visual editing: edits that require coordinated changes across video and audio.
  • —Speech editing: edits involving spoken content, speaker identity, or speech-related audio-video consistency.
  • —Video-only editing: visual edits where the audio stream should be preserved.
  • —Audio-only editing: audio edits where the visual stream should be preserved.

What AVE-Compass Evaluates

AVE-Compass evaluates edited audio-video outputs along complementary dimensions:

  • —Editing Intent: the primary metric, measuring whether the output both follows the instruction and preserves non-target content.
  • —Instruction Following: whether the requested edit is correctly executed.
  • —Fidelity Preserving: whether non-target visual and audio content remains faithful to the source.
  • —Realism: whether the edited audio-video result is natural, coherent, and free of obvious artifacts.

The paper also reports automated metrics for cross-modal, visual, and audio quality, including AV Sync, Lip Sync, Video Aesthetic, Subject Consistency, Motion Smoothness, Audio Aesthetic, and Speech Quality.

[image]

Leaderboard

Models are ranked by Overall Editing Intent, the primary metric of AVE-Compass. Scores are reported on a 0-100 scale, and higher is better.

RankModelOverallVideoAudio
1AVE-Agent (Wan)59.866.750.2
2Wan2.742.460.124.8
3HappyHorse41.356.718.8
4Gemini-Omni*38.056.110.0
5Seedance26.636.113.5
6LTX215.210.726.4

*Gemini-Omni misses 16 speech edits due to content moderation.

Dataset Files

text
AVE-Compass/
  assets/
    bench.png              # benchmark overview image
    evaluation_matrix.png  # evaluation matrix rendered from the paper
  videos/
    *.mp4              # 145 source videos
    metadata.jsonl     # 196 Dataset Viewer rows
  edit_instructions/  # 196 edit instruction JSON files
  checklists/         # 196 checklist JSON files

The Dataset Viewer uses videos/metadata.jsonl to display each source video together with its edit instruction and instruction_index.

Edit Instruction JSON Format

Each file in edit_instructions/ corresponds to one edit instruction:

json
{
  "video": "example.mp4",
  "task": "example",
  "instruction_index": 1,
  "total_instructions_for_video": 1,
  "instruction": {
    "category_label": "joint",
    "category": "J1",
    "operation": "J1.1 New Source Insertion",
    "prompt_en": "Add ...",
    "audio_label": {
      "audio_op": "add",
      "sound_type": "event_sfx",
      "edit_aspect": "content"
    },
    "difficulty": {
      "d1_object_localization": "hard",
      "d1_reason": "...",
      "d2_audio_complexity": "complex",
      "d3_cross_modal_linkage": "explicit",
      "d3_reason": "..."
    }
  }
}

Important fields:

  • —video: source video filename.
  • —instruction_index: 1-based index of the edit instruction for the source video.
  • —prompt_en: English edit instruction.
  • —category_label: one of joint, speech, video_only, or audio_only.
  • —audio_label: structured annotation of the audio-side edit target.
  • —difficulty: difficulty annotations for object localization, audio complexity, and cross-modal linkage.

Checklist JSON Format

Each file in checklists/ corresponds to the edit instruction with the same video and instruction_index. Checklist files contain atomic Yes/No questions for evaluating instruction following and fidelity preservation.

Typical fields include:

  • —video: source video filename.
  • —instruction_index: 1-based edit instruction index for the source video.
  • —edit_prompt: the edit instruction.
  • —edit_category: editing branch.
  • —questions: modality-tagged diagnostic questions.

Each checklist question includes:

  • —question_id
  • —dimension
  • —subdimension
  • —modality_tag
  • —question

Data Construction

AVE-Compass was constructed through a human-in-the-loop pipeline. Candidate edit instructions were generated from structured source-video descriptions using modality-aware LLM generators. A critic model filtered out unnatural, infeasible, or ambiguous instructions, and human annotators verified naturalness, executability, and target specificity. The verified instructions were then converted into fine-grained checklist items, followed by human deduplication and refinement.

Usage Notes

  • —Pair each edit instruction with the source video indicated by its video field.
  • —Pair each checklist with the edit instruction sharing the same video and instruction_index.

Citation

If you use AVE-Compass, please cite:

bibtex
@article{wen2026avecompass,
  title = {AVE-Compass: Towards Holistic Evaluation for Audio-Video Editing Abilities},
  author = {Wen, Yuqing and Huang, Yukai and Xie, Qianqian and Wu, Jiangtao and Lin, Yibin and Gu, Yikai and Chen, Jialu and Zhang, Yuanxing and Liu, Jiaheng},
  year = {2026},
  eprint = {2607.24821},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  primaryClass = {cs.MM},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.24821}
}