MCINext/synthetic-persian-chatbot-rag-summary-retrieval
Dataset Summary Synthetic Persian Chatbot RAG Summary Retrieval (SynPerChatbotRAGSumSRetrieval) is a Persian (Farsi) dataset for the Summary Retrieval task, specifically built for Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems. It is part of the FaMTEB (Farsi Massive Text Embedding Benchmark). The dataset was synthetically generated using GPT-4o-mini and is derived from the Synthetic Persian Chatbot RAG Dataset. It evaluates the ability of models to match conversations—possibly… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/MCINext/synthetic-persian-chatbot-rag-summary-retrieval.
Dataset Summary
Synthetic Persian Chatbot RAG Summary Retrieval (SynPerChatbotRAGSumSRetrieval) is a Persian (Farsi) dataset for the Summary Retrieval task, specifically built for Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems. It is part of the FaMTEB (Farsi Massive Text Embedding Benchmark). The dataset was synthetically generated using GPT-4o-mini and is derived from the Synthetic Persian Chatbot RAG Dataset. It evaluates the ability of models to match conversations—possibly incomplete or context-dependent—to their correct summaries.
- Language(s): Persian (Farsi)
- Task(s): Summary Retrieval
- Source: Synthetically generated using GPT-4o-mini, from Synthetic Persian Chatbot RAG Dataset
- Part of FaMTEB: Yes
Supported Tasks and Leaderboards
This dataset benchmarks how effectively a model can retrieve the correct summary for a Persian chatbot conversation in a RAG-like scenario. It emphasizes real-world complexities like partial history and conversational context. Model performance is listed on the Persian MTEB Leaderboard.
Construction
- GPT-4o-mini generated RAG-style Persian chatbot conversations with varying context depths.
- Each conversation was paired with an LLM-generated summary.
- The dataset includes these conversation–summary pairs for supervised evaluation.
- Human validation confirmed the summaries’ alignment with conversations, achieving 99% accuracy in relevance evaluation.
Data Splits
- Train: 3,261 samples
- Development (Dev): 0 samples
- Test: 1,087 samples
