CoolFace
Datasetpublic

HankYang428/GENIUS

🧠 GENIUS Generative Fluid Intelligence Evaluation Suite [Paper]   [Code]   [Blog]   [Dataset] Leaderboard GENIUS evaluates every generated image on three complementary axes, each scored 0 (fail), 1 (partial), or 2 (perfect): Rule Compliance (RC): follows the newly defined rule, grounded by expert-written evaluation hints. Visual Consistency (VC): preserves required identities, objects, and contextual visual attributes.… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/HankYang428/GENIUS.

sourceHugging Facecc-by-nc-4.0updated 2mo agoView on Hugging Face
1likes121downloads
Dataset Card

<div align="center">

🧠 GENIUS

Generative Fluid Intelligence Evaluation Suite

![Paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.11144) ![Code](https://github.com/arctanxarc/GENIUS) ![Dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/HankYang428/GENIUS) ![License](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)

[Paper] &nbsp; [Code] &nbsp; [Blog] &nbsp; [Dataset]

</div>

[image]

Leaderboard

GENIUS evaluates every generated image on three complementary axes, each scored 0 (fail), 1 (partial), or 2 (perfect):

  • β€”Rule Compliance (RC): follows the newly defined rule, grounded by expert-written evaluation hints.
  • β€”Visual Consistency (VC): preserves required identities, objects, and contextual visual attributes.
  • β€”Aesthetic Quality (AQ): remains visually coherent and avoids obvious generation artifacts.

The Overall score uses the paper's weighted metric ratio RC:VC:AQ = 6:3.5:0.5. The primary Gemini score averages three independent judge runs per sample. Qwen2.5-VL-72B is an independent robustness judge: it assigns lower absolute scores overall, while preserving the main relative performance trends.

Rank by GeminiModel / MethodTypeInterleavedGemini-3-Pro OverallQwen2.5-VL-72B Overall
1Nano Banana ProProprietaryβœ“57.1948.35
2SeeDream 4.5Proprietaryβœ—52.8444.17
3Nano BananaProprietaryβœ“50.6642.88
4GPT-ImageProprietaryβœ—47.1540.94
5Emu3.5-ImageOpen sourceβœ—36.6728.80
6FLUX.2-devOpen sourceβœ—34.3927.37
7Ours (Bagel + attention intervention)Training-free methodβœ“32.9223.91
8Qwen-ImageOpen sourceβœ—30.5825.67
9Omini-Gen2Open sourceβœ—27.8721.12
10BagelOpen sourceβœ“26.7418.97
11GLM-ImageOpen sourceβœ—24.7117.45
12SeeDream 4.0Proprietaryβœ—21.2617.74
13NextStep-1Open sourceβœ—10.449.90

GENIUS leaderboard judged by Gemini-3-Pro:

[image]

What is GENIUS?

Most image-generation benchmarks primarily test crystallized intelligence: whether a model can retrieve and reproduce concepts learned during pre-training. GENIUS instead evaluates Generative Fluid Intelligence (GFI)β€”the ability to solve visual-generation problems whose rules are defined entirely by the immediate multimodal context.

GENIUS contains 510 expert-curated test cases with interleaved text and multi-image inputs. Removing either modality makes an instance unsolvable. The benchmark spans three core capabilities:

GFI capabilityWhat it testsTasksSamples
🧩 Implicit Pattern InductionInfer unstated visual preferences and apply them to a new imageImplicit Pattern Generation86
πŸ“ Ad-hoc Constraint ExecutionExecute newly defined visual or symbolic rulesSymbolic Constraint Generation; Visual Constraint Generation213
🌍 Contextual Knowledge AdaptationFollow contextual knowledge even when it conflicts with familiar semantics or physical priorsPrior-Conflicting Generation; Multi-Semantic Generation211
Total3 dimensions Β· 5 tasks Β· 20 sub-tasks510

Dataset composition

Viewer configDimensionSub-tasksSamples
implicit_patternImplicit Pattern InductionOverall Style (15), Spatial Relationship (14), Visual Feature (18), Palette (20), Entity (19)86
symbolic_constraintAd-hoc Constraint ExecutionOperation Implementation (27), Visual Metaphor (29), Layout (30), Visual Feature (38), Instance Binding (29)153
visual_constraintAd-hoc Constraint ExecutionSimple Constraint (26), Complex Constraint (34)60
prior_conflictingContextual Knowledge AdaptationAbnormal Biological Growth (21), Gravity Anomaly (20), Abnormal Animal Behavior (20), Time Reversal (20), Weather Anomaly (20)101
multi_semanticContextual Knowledge AdaptationNoun Phrase (50), Verb Phrase (30), Adjective Phrase (30)110

Each record contains:

FieldDescription
idTask-local identifier used to name the generated output
dimension / taskGFI capability dimension and benchmark task
sub_dimensionFine-grained capability category
sub_sub_dimensionAdditional fine-grained category used by some symbolic constraints
contextInterleaved context that establishes the new rule or pattern
instructionImage-generation or image-editing request
rc_hintHuman-verified gold hint for Rule Compliance evaluation
vc_hintHuman-verified gold hint for Visual Consistency, when applicable
image_pathsOrdered, de-duplicated repository paths for images referenced by the record

Image placeholders use the form <image:NAME> and resolve to CONFIG/images/NAME.png. For example, <image:space_0> in the implicit_pattern config refers to implicit_pattern/images/space_0.png.

Viewer representation. The five viewer/*.jsonl files are generated from the canonical */test_data.json annotations. They preserve all annotation text while normalizing the occasionally mixed string/list representation of vc_hint into a nullable string, giving the Dataset Viewer a stable schema. Rebuild them with python scripts/build_viewer_data.py after changing the source annotations.

Quick start

Load any of the five task configs directly with πŸ€— Datasets:

python
from datasets import load_dataset

dataset = load_dataset(
    "HankYang428/GENIUS",
    "implicit_pattern",  # or symbolic_constraint, visual_constraint,
                         # prior_conflicting, multi_semantic
    split="test",
)

print(dataset[0])

Download the full repository, including all reference images:

bash
git lfs install
git clone https://huggingface.co/datasets/HankYang428/GENIUS

Alternative mirrors: Google Drive Β· Baidu Netdisk (password: iek1)

For model-output layout and evaluation commands, see the official code repository.

Intended use and limitations

GENIUS is designed for evaluating multimodal image-generation and image-editing systems on novel, context-defined problems. It is a compact evaluation suite, not a training corpus. Scores measure performance on the benchmark's curated rules and judge protocol; they should not be interpreted as a complete measure of general intelligence or image-generation quality. LMM-as-a-judge evaluation can retain model-specific biases, which is why the paper reports results from two independent judge families and uses expert-written gold hints.

License

GENIUS is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License and is intended for non-commercial research use.

Citation

If GENIUS is useful in your research, please cite:

bibtex
@misc{an2026geniusgenerativefluidintelligence,
  title         = {GENIUS: Generative Fluid Intelligence Evaluation Suite},
  author        = {Ruichuan An and Sihan Yang and Ziyu Guo and Wei Dai and Zijun Shen and Haodong Li and Renrui Zhang and Xinyu Wei and Guopeng Li and Wenshan Wu and Wentao Zhang},
  year          = {2026},
  eprint        = {2602.11144},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  primaryClass  = {cs.LG},
  url           = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.11144}
}

Contact

Questions and feedback are welcome via GitHub Issues or arctanxarc@gmail.com.