EvalData/TabMI-Bench
TabMI-Bench A protocol benchmark for mechanistic interpretability (MI) of tabular foundation models (TFMs). NeurIPS 2026 Evaluations & Datasets Track submission. What's in this dataset This Hugging Face repository hosts the frozen aggregated artifacts that drive every numbered table and figure in the paper. Bundling these allows reviewers to verify the paper's key numerics without re-running 40 GPU-hours of experiments. File Source experiment Used by… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/EvalData/TabMI-Bench.
TabMI-Bench
A protocol benchmark for mechanistic interpretability (MI) of tabular foundation models (TFMs). NeurIPS 2026 Evaluations & Datasets Track submission.
What's in this dataset
This Hugging Face repository hosts the frozen aggregated artifacts that drive every numbered table and figure in the paper. Bundling these allows reviewers to verify the paper's key numerics without re-running 40 GPU-hours of experiments.
Code & full benchmark suite
The hooks, synthetic probe generators, evaluation scripts, statistical analysis, figure generation, and tests are hosted at: <https://github.com/evaldataset/TabMI-Bench>
To regenerate paper-facing tables and figures from this dataset without GPU access:
git clone https://github.com/evaldataset/TabMI-Bench
cd TabMI-Bench
pip install -r requirements.txt
make reproduce-paper-frozenWhat is TabMI-Bench?
TabMI-Bench provides:
- Hook-based activation extraction for 5 TFMs spanning 3 architectural families (TabPFN v2/v2.5, TabICL v2, TabDPT, iLTM) plus NAM out-of-family holdout
- 4 controlled synthetic probe families (bilinear, sinusoidal, polynomial, mixed) with known ground-truth intermediary variables
- 4-step evaluation protocol (synthetic profile → causal validation → negative controls → real-world transfer)
- Evidence-coded MI applicability matrix (8 techniques × 4 architectures with seed-count superscripts)
- A primary diagnostic finding: whole-layer clean activation patching is uninformative on ICL-style TFMs due to deterministic cascading; corruption-based (noising) tracing is the informative alternative.
Three descriptive reference computation profiles emerge as calibration baselines:
- Staged (TabPFN): U-shaped intermediary recoverability with mid-layer concentration
- Distributed (TabICL, TabDPT): uniformly high recoverability across layers
- Preprocessing-dominant (iLTM): tree+PCA preprocessing performs the heavy lifting
Croissant 1.0 metadata
The repository includes croissant.json with 12 RAI fields (data limitations, biases, sensitive information, use cases, social impact, synthetic data flag, source datasets, provenance, collection, maintenance plan, etc.). See croissant.json in the repository.
Source datasets
Real-world evaluation uses public datasets only (no new collection):
Citation
@inproceedings{anonymous2026tabmibench,
title={TabMI-Bench: Evaluating Mechanistic Interpretability Methods Across Tabular Foundation Model Architectures},
author={Anonymous},
booktitle={Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) Evaluations \& Datasets Track},
year={2026}
}License
MIT. See LICENSE.
