ClarusC64/legal-oral-argument-coherence-pressure-v0.1
What this dataset is You get a legal issue a judge question a counsel answer context You decide Does the answer hold structural coherence under pressure Task Answer coherent or incoherent Only output one word. What it tests argument integrity under judicial pressure concession detection contradiction detection structural collapse moments Why this matters Most legal analytics looks at outcomes. This dataset looks at the live failure moment. The point where an argument breaks in court. That is… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/ClarusC64/legal-oral-argument-coherence-pressure-v0.1.
What this dataset is
You get
a legal issue
a judge question
a counsel answer
context
You decide
Does the answer hold structural coherence under pressure
Task
Answer
coherent or incoherent
Only output one word.
What it tests
argument integrity under judicial pressure
concession detection
contradiction detection
structural collapse moments
Why this matters
Most legal analytics looks at outcomes. This dataset looks at the live failure moment. The point where an argument breaks in court.
That is where rulings often turn.
Use cases
advocacy training
appellate analytics
legal AI reasoning evaluation
argument robustness scoring
Evaluation
Exact match accuracy Invalid if response not one of the two labels
Dataset structure
Small synthetic set for v0.1 Designed for expansion into real transcript annotation later.
