ClarusC64/ffr-physiology-prediction-coherence-baseline-mapping-v0.1
Goal Define the baseline coherencebetween AI-derived FFR predictionsand real physiological signals. Signals include: myocardial perfusion wall motion stress test results vital signs This dataset establisheswhat physiologically plausible alignmentlooks like. Without this baselineimplausibility cannot be detected. Required output The model must provide: physiological_coherence_score interpretation of alignment error baseline_label Why… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/ClarusC64/ffr-physiology-prediction-coherence-baseline-mapping-v0.1.
Goal
Define the baseline coherence between AI-derived FFR predictions and real physiological signals.
Signals include:
- myocardial perfusion
- wall motion
- stress test results
- vital signs
This dataset establishes what physiologically plausible alignment looks like.
Without this baseline implausibility cannot be detected.
Required output
The model must provide:
- physiologicalcoherencescore
- interpretation of alignment error
- baseline_label
Why this matters
AI-FFR can remain stable numerically while becoming physiologically implausible.
This dataset detects the moment prediction and physiology stop telling the same story.
It enables:
- cardiology validation workflows
- deployment safety checks
- regulator review
- multi-modality consistency testing
Evaluation
The scorer checks:
- coherence reasoning present
- numeric interpretation
- baseline classification
Future versions will include true regression scoring against ground-truth coherence values.
