ClarusC64/clinical-counterfactual-coherence-optimal-path-selection-v0.1
What this dataset tests Whether a model can choose the counterfactual path that maximizessystemic coherence versus the real outcome. Required outputs optimal_intervention_choice coherence_score_delta justification_narrative Choice set REAL CF1 CF2 CF3 Coherence means explains and stabilizes multi-stream signals avoids iatrogenic oscillation reduces complication risk supports a stable recovery basin Typical failures picking the highest single metric skipping… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/ClarusC64/clinical-counterfactual-coherence-optimal-path-selection-v0.1.
What this dataset tests
Whether a model can choose the counterfactual path that maximizes systemic coherence versus the real outcome.
Required outputs
- optimalinterventionchoice
- coherencescoredelta
- justification_narrative
Choice set
- REAL
- CF1
- CF2
- CF3
Coherence means
- explains and stabilizes multi-stream signals
- avoids iatrogenic oscillation
- reduces complication risk
- supports a stable recovery basin
Typical failures
- picking the highest single metric
- skipping the delta vs real
- giving justification with no cascade logic
Suggested prompt wrapper
System
You select the coherence-optimal counterfactual path.
User
Real case {realcasesummary}
Real outcome {realoutcomesummary}
Real coherence score {realcoherencescore0100}
Counterfactual menu {counterfactual_menu}
Cascade summaries {counterfactualcascadesummaries}
Counterfactual scores {counterfactualcoherencescores0100}
Return
- optimal choice
- coherence score delta vs real
- one paragraph justification based on the cascade
Citation
ClarusC64 dataset family
