AryaWu/sqlite
0
1# 2013-04-132#3# The author disclaims copyright to this source code. In place of4# a legal notice, here is a blessing:5#6# May you do good and not evil.7# May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others.8# May you share freely, never taking more than you give.9#10#***********************************************************************11#12# This file tests features of the name resolver (the component that13# figures out what identifiers in the SQL statement refer to) that14# were fixed by ticket [2500cdb9be].15#16# See also tickets [1c69be2daf] and [f617ea3125] from 2013-08-14.17#18# Also a fuzzer-discovered problem on 2015-04-23.19#20 21set testdir [file dirname $argv0]22source $testdir/tester.tcl23 24# "ORDER BY y" binds to the output result-set column named "y"25# if available. If no output column is named "y", then try to26# bind against an input column named "y".27#28# This is classical SQL92 behavior.29#30do_test resolver01-1.1 {31 catchsql {32 CREATE TABLE t1(x, y); INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(11,22);33 CREATE TABLE t2(y, z); INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(33,44);34 SELECT 1 AS y FROM t1, t2 ORDER BY y;35 }36} {0 1}37do_test resolver01-1.2 {38 catchsql {39 SELECT 1 AS yy FROM t1, t2 ORDER BY y;40 }41} {1 {ambiguous column name: y}}42do_test resolver01-1.3 {43 catchsql {44 CREATE TABLE t3(x,y); INSERT INTO t3 VALUES(11,44),(33,22);45 SELECT x AS y FROM t3 ORDER BY y;46 }47} {0 {11 33}}48do_test resolver01-1.4 {49 catchsql {50 SELECT x AS yy FROM t3 ORDER BY y;51 }52} {0 {33 11}}53 54# SQLite allows the WHERE clause to reference output columns if there is55# no other way to resolve the name.56#57do_test resolver01-1.5 {58 catchsql {59 SELECT x AS yy FROM t3 ORDER BY yy;60 }61} {0 {11 33}}62do_test resolver01-1.6 {63 catchsql {64 SELECT x AS yy FROM t3 ORDER BY 1;65 }66} {0 {11 33}}67 68# The "ORDER BY y COLLATE nocase" form works the same as "ORDER BY y".69# The "y" binds more tightly to output columns than to input columns.70#71# This is for compatibility with SQL92 and with historical SQLite behavior.72# Note that PostgreSQL considers "y COLLATE nocase" to be an expression73# and thus PostgreSQL treats this case as if it where the 3.x case below.74#75do_test resolver01-2.1 {76 catchsql {77 SELECT 2 AS y FROM t1, t2 ORDER BY y COLLATE nocase;78 }79} {0 2}80do_test resolver01-2.2 {81 catchsql {82 SELECT 2 AS yy FROM t1, t2 ORDER BY y COLLATE nocase;83 }84} {1 {ambiguous column name: y}}85do_test resolver01-2.3 {86 catchsql {87 SELECT x AS y FROM t3 ORDER BY y COLLATE nocase;88 }89} {0 {11 33}}90do_test resolver01-2.4 {91 catchsql {92 SELECT x AS yy FROM t3 ORDER BY y COLLATE nocase;93 }94} {0 {33 11}}95do_test resolver01-2.5 {96 catchsql {97 SELECT x AS yy FROM t3 ORDER BY yy COLLATE nocase;98 }99} {0 {11 33}}100do_test resolver01-2.6 {101 catchsql {102 SELECT x AS yy FROM t3 ORDER BY 1 COLLATE nocase;103 }104} {0 {11 33}}105 106# But if the form is "ORDER BY expr" then bind more tightly to the107# the input column names and only use the output column names if no108# input column name matches.109#110# This is SQL99 behavior, as implemented by PostgreSQL and MS-SQL.111# Note that Oracle works differently.112#113do_test resolver01-3.1 {114 catchsql {115 SELECT 3 AS y FROM t1, t2 ORDER BY +y;116 }117} {1 {ambiguous column name: y}}118do_test resolver01-3.2 {119 catchsql {120 SELECT 2 AS yy FROM t1, t2 ORDER BY +y;121 }122} {1 {ambiguous column name: y}}123do_test resolver01-3.3 {124 catchsql {125 SELECT x AS y FROM t3 ORDER BY +y;126 }127} {0 {33 11}}128do_test resolver01-3.4 {129 catchsql {130 SELECT x AS yy FROM t3 ORDER BY +y;131 }132} {0 {33 11}}133do_test resolver01-3.5 {134 catchsql {135 SELECT x AS yy FROM t3 ORDER BY +yy136 }137} {0 {11 33}}138 139# This is the test case given in ticket [f617ea3125e9] (with table name140# changed from "t1" to "t4". The behavior of (1) and (3) match with141# PostgreSQL, but we intentionally break with PostgreSQL to provide142# SQL92 behavior for case (2).143#144do_execsql_test resolver01-4.1 {145 CREATE TABLE t4(m CHAR(2));146 INSERT INTO t4 VALUES('az');147 INSERT INTO t4 VALUES('by');148 INSERT INTO t4 VALUES('cx');149 SELECT '1', substr(m,2) AS m FROM t4 ORDER BY m;150 SELECT '2', substr(m,2) AS m FROM t4 ORDER BY m COLLATE binary;151 SELECT '3', substr(m,2) AS m FROM t4 ORDER BY lower(m);152} {1 x 1 y 1 z 2 x 2 y 2 z 3 z 3 y 3 x}153 154##########################################################################155# Test cases for ticket [1c69be2dafc28]: Make sure the GROUP BY binds156# more tightly to the input tables in all cases.157#158# This first case case has been wrong in SQLite for time out of mind.159# For SQLite version 3.7.17 the answer was two rows, which is wrong.160#161do_execsql_test resolver01-5.1 {162 CREATE TABLE t5(m CHAR(2));163 INSERT INTO t5 VALUES('ax');164 INSERT INTO t5 VALUES('bx');165 INSERT INTO t5 VALUES('cy');166 SELECT count(*), substr(m,2,1) AS m FROM t5 GROUP BY m ORDER BY 1, 2;167} {1 x 1 x 1 y}168 169# This case is unambiguous and has always been correct.170#171do_execsql_test resolver01-5.2 {172 SELECT count(*), substr(m,2,1) AS mx FROM t5 GROUP BY m ORDER BY 1, 2;173} {1 x 1 x 1 y}174 175# This case is not allowed in standard SQL, but SQLite allows and does176# the sensible thing.177#178do_execsql_test resolver01-5.3 {179 SELECT count(*), substr(m,2,1) AS mx FROM t5 GROUP BY mx ORDER BY 1, 2;180} {1 y 2 x}181do_execsql_test resolver01-5.4 {182 SELECT count(*), substr(m,2,1) AS mx FROM t5183 GROUP BY substr(m,2,1) ORDER BY 1, 2;184} {1 y 2 x}185 186# These test case weere provided in the 2013-08-14 email from Rob Golsteijn187# that originally reported the problem of ticket [1c69be2dafc28].188#189do_execsql_test resolver01-6.1 {190 CREATE TABLE t61(name);191 SELECT min(name) FROM t61 GROUP BY lower(name);192} {}193do_execsql_test resolver01-6.2 {194 SELECT min(name) AS name FROM t61 GROUP BY lower(name); 195} {}196do_execsql_test resolver01-6.3 {197 CREATE TABLE t63(name);198 INSERT INTO t63 VALUES (NULL);199 INSERT INTO t63 VALUES ('abc');200 SELECT count(),201 NULLIF(name,'abc') AS name202 FROM t63203 GROUP BY lower(name);204} {1 {} 1 {}}205 206do_execsql_test resolver01-7.1 {207 SELECT 2 AS x WHERE (SELECT x AS y WHERE 3>y);208} {2}209do_execsql_test resolver01-7.2 {210 SELECT 2 AS x WHERE (SELECT x AS y WHERE 1>y);211} {}212 213 214 215 216finish_test217 