datasets
Training and evaluation data, with the modality, task and licence stated up front. Listed live from the Hugging Face Hub.
staining-robustness-evaluation
A Protocol for Evaluating Robustness to H&E Staining Variation in Computational Pathology Models
This repository provides the stain references, pretrained models, and experimental results required to:
Define custom staining references using our PLISM reference library
Reproduce our published controlled staining robustness experiments
👉 Code repository: https://github.com/lely475/staining-robustness-evaluation/tree/main
👉 Associated publication: Paper
Overview: How… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/CTPLab-DBE-UniBas/staining-robustness-evaluation.RAG-Evaluation-Dataset-KO
Allganize RAG Leaderboard
Allganize RAG 리더보드는 5개 도메인(금융, 공공, 의료, 법률, 커머스)에 대해서 한국어 RAG의 성능을 평가합니다.일반적인 RAG는 간단한 질문에 대해서는 답변을 잘 하지만, 문서의 테이블과 이미지에 대한 질문은 답변을 잘 못합니다.
RAG 도입을 원하는 수많은 기업들은 자사에 맞는 도메인, 문서 타입, 질문 형태를 반영한 한국어 RAG 성능표를 원하고 있습니다.평가를 위해서는 공개된 문서와 질문, 답변 같은 데이터 셋이 필요하지만, 자체 구축은 시간과 비용이 많이 드는 일입니다.이제 올거나이즈는 RAG 평가 데이터를 모두 공개합니다.
RAG는 Parser, Retrieval, Generation 크게 3가지 파트로 구성되어 있습니다.현재, 공개되어 있는 RAG 리더보드 중, 3가지 파트를 전체적으로 평가하는 한국어로 구성된 리더보드는 없습니다.
Allganize RAG 리더보드에서는 문서를… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/allganize/RAG-Evaluation-Dataset-KO.circuitlens-gemma-2-2btranscoder-descriptions-and-evaluations
CircuitLens & WeightLens: Transcoder Descriptions and Evaluations
This dataset contains automatically generated descriptions and evaluation metrics for Gemma-2-2B transcoders, produced using CircuitLens and WeightLens methods.
Methods
CircuitLens: https://github.com/egolimblevskaia/CircuitLens
WeightLens: https://github.com/egolimblevskaia/WeightLens
Dataset Structure
The dataset is organized by layers (0, 4, 7, 10, 12, 15, 18, 21, 23, 25), with each layer… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/egolimblevskaia/circuitlens-gemma-2-2btranscoder-descriptions-and-evaluations.paperswithcode-data-evaluation-tables
Process data from paperswithcode
See https://huggingface.co/datasets/pwc-archive/files/tree/main.
Download and unzip evaluation tables:
curl -L -O "https://huggingface.co/datasets/pwc-archive/files/resolve/main/jul-28-evaluation-tables.json.gz"
gunzip jul-28-evaluation-tables.json.gz
Install jq.
See https://jqlang.org/.
If on Debian/Ubuntu, install with sudo apt-get install jq.
Example jq to extract:
jq -r '
def process(parent):
.task as $current_task |
(if parent then… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/felixleungsc/paperswithcode-data-evaluation-tables.RAG-Evaluation-Dataset-JA
Allganize RAG Leaderboard とは
Allganize RAG Leaderboard は、5つの業種ドメイン(金融、情報通信、製造、公共、流通・小売)において、日本語のRAGの性能評価を実施したものです。一般的なRAGは簡単な質問に対する回答は可能ですが、図表の中に記載されている情報などに対して回答できないケースが多く存在します。RAGの導入を希望する多くの企業は、自社と同じ業種ドメイン、文書タイプ、質問形態を反映した日本語のRAGの性能評価を求めています。RAGの性能評価には、検証ドキュメントや質問と回答といったデータセット、検証環境の構築が必要となりますが、AllganizeではRAGの導入検討の参考にしていただきたく、日本語のRAG性能評価に必要なデータを公開いたしました。RAGソリューションは、Parser、Retrieval、Generation の3つのパートで構成されています。現在、この3つのパートを総合的に評価した日本語のRAG Leaderboardは存在していません。(公開時点)Allganize RAG… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/allganize/RAG-Evaluation-Dataset-JA.IELTS-writing-task-2-evaluationAudioVisual-Benchmark-Evaluation
AudioVisual Benchmark Evaluation — evaluation subsets
Item-id lists for the audio-visual benchmark subsets used in our reported
evaluation tables.
Layout
<benchmark>/eval_subset.csv item ids evaluated in the paper
<benchmark>/media_index.csv id -> media filename(s)
<benchmark>/media/ the media files those ids refer to
eval_subset.csv holds a single id column keyed to the source benchmark
(question_id, idx, or index). media/ contains exactly the… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/plnguyen2908/AudioVisual-Benchmark-Evaluation.wmt-da-human-evaluation
Dataset Summary
This dataset contains all DA human annotations from previous WMT News Translation shared tasks.
The data is organised into 8 columns:
lp: language pair
src: input text
mt: translation
ref: reference translation
score: z score
raw: direct assessment
annotators: number of annotators
domain: domain of the input text (e.g. news)
year: collection year
You can also find the original data for each year in the results section https://www.statmt.org/wmt{YEAR}/results.html… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/RicardoRei/wmt-da-human-evaluation.wmt-mqm-human-evaluation
Dataset Summary
This dataset contains all MQM human annotations from previous WMT Metrics shared tasks and the MQM annotations from Experts, Errors, and Context.
The data is organised into 8 columns:
lp: language pair
src: input text
mt: translation
ref: reference translation
score: MQM score
system: MT Engine that produced the translation
annotators: number of annotators
domain: domain of the input text (e.g. news)
year: collection year
You can also find the original data here.… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/RicardoRei/wmt-mqm-human-evaluation.JobBERT-evaluation-dataset
JobBERT evaluation dataset 💾
This is the official repository containing the evaluation data that was used for the JobBERT paper. This dataset is a list of vacancy titles, each tagged with an ESCO (v1.0.5) occupation.
The full dataset is split into two files in a stratified way by class distribution. This data was automatically collected from a large governmental job board.
Access the JobBERT paper here: https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.09605
BibTeX Citation
If you use this… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/TechWolf/JobBERT-evaluation-dataset.ecommerce-analytics-sql-evaluation
Ecommerce Analytics SQL Evaluation (declared GMV, verified answer key)
An evalpack: an evaluation database generated from the answer key, not
annotated after the fact. A VLDB 2026 audit found 52.8% of BIRD Mini-Dev
answer keys wrong because benchmarks annotate answers onto existing
databases; this dataset inverts the order. The declared properties (curves,
shares, identities) are the specification, the database is generated to
satisfy them exactly, and every shipped question was… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/rasinmuhammed/ecommerce-analytics-sql-evaluation.saas-finance-sql-evaluation
SaaS Finance SQL Evaluation (MRR waterfalls that reconcile exactly)
An evalpack: an evaluation database generated from the answer key, not
annotated after the fact. A VLDB 2026 audit found 52.8% of BIRD Mini-Dev
answer keys wrong because benchmarks annotate answers onto existing
databases; this dataset inverts the order. The declared properties (curves,
shares, identities) are the specification, the database is generated to
satisfy them exactly, and every shipped question was… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/rasinmuhammed/saas-finance-sql-evaluation.wmt-sqm-human-evaluation
Dataset Summary
In 2022, several changes were made to the annotation procedure used in the WMT Translation task. In contrast to the standard DA (sliding scale from 0-100) used in previous years, in 2022 annotators performed DA+SQM (Direct Assessment + Scalar Quality Metric). In DA+SQM, the annotators still provide a raw score between 0 and 100, but also are presented with seven labeled tick marks. DA+SQM helps to stabilize scores across annotators (as compared to DA).
The data is… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/RicardoRei/wmt-sqm-human-evaluation.responsible-agent-workflow-evaluation
Responsible Agent Workflow Evaluation
Version 1.0.0 contains 130 wholly synthetic scenarios for evaluating
whether an AI agent respects safety, permission and accountability boundaries
in operational settings. Thirteen categories contain ten scenarios each. Every
record includes an intentionally unsafe request, contextual facts, expected
safe behaviour, explicitly prohibited behaviour, severity, evaluation criteria
and reviewer guidance.
This is a red-team and… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/nwhite-systems/responsible-agent-workflow-evaluation.extrinsic-evaluations
Extrinsic evaluations — the union view
One tidy long-format table of every extrinsic (downstream, task-level) evaluation
produced across the 2026-08-26 mergeability workstreams, so that a single file answers
"how did model X score on benchmark Y" regardless of which experiment produced it.
The per-experiment datasets remain the authoritative record of their own methods,
figures and caveats. This is the union view, not a replacement, and it deliberately
carries no analysis of its… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/Cross-Mergeability/extrinsic-evaluations.edtech-sql-evaluation
EdTech SQL Evaluation (declared learning curve, verified answer key)
An evalpack: an evaluation database generated from the answer key, not
annotated after the fact. A VLDB 2026 audit found 52.8% of BIRD Mini-Dev
answer keys wrong because benchmarks annotate answers onto existing
databases; this dataset inverts the order. The declared properties (curves,
shares, identities) are the specification, the database is generated to
satisfy them exactly, and every shipped question was… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/rasinmuhammed/edtech-sql-evaluation.japanese-image-classification-evaluation-dataset
recruit-jp/japanese-image-classification-evaluation-dataset
Overview
Developed by: Recruit Co., Ltd.
Dataset type: Image Classification
Language(s): Japanese
LICENSE: CC-BY-4.0
More details are described in our tech blog post.
日本語CLIP学習済みモデルとその評価用データセットの公開
Dataset Details
This dataset is comprised of four image classification tasks related to concepts and things unique to Japan. Specifically, is consists of the following tasks.
jafood101: Image… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/recruit-jp/japanese-image-classification-evaluation-dataset.mHallucination_Evaluation
Multilingual Hallucination Evaluation in the wild
The dataset was as part of the paper: How Much Do LLMs Hallucinate across Languages? On Multilingual Estimation of LLM Hallucination in the Wild
Below is the figure summarizing the multilingual hallucination evaluation dataset creation (and multilingual hallucination detection dataset):
Dataset Details
The dataset is a high quality synthetic query/prompt and wikipedia reference pair for estimating hallucinations in the… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/WueNLP/mHallucination_Evaluation.llm-math-evaluation-dataset
LLM Math Response Evaluation Dataset
Dataset Summary
A human-annotated dataset of 150 AI-generated math responses
evaluated across GPT-4o, Claude, and Gemini. Each response is
scored on Correctness, Reasoning, and Clarity using a structured
rubric, with written justification for every score.
Supported Tasks
LLM evaluation and benchmarking
Math reasoning quality assessment
Error type classification in AI responses
Dataset Structure… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/nbvbharath-1729/llm-math-evaluation-dataset.remote-ai-evaluation-training-market-snapshot
Dataset Description
This is an aggregate August 22, 2026 research snapshot from Specialist AI Work, an independent PatchMedia tracker of reviewed remote AI evaluation, AI training, data annotation-adjacent, and expert-review opportunities.
The live Specialist AI Work inventory has advanced since this snapshot. The counts in this repository describe the immutable August 22 research object; they are not a claim about today's inventory.
Reporting date: 2026-08-22
Dataset… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/patchmedia-org/remote-ai-evaluation-training-market-snapshot.agent-evaluation-benchmark
Agent Evaluation Benchmark
A benchmark dataset for evaluating AI agent tool-use capabilities across 55+ test cases spanning 14 categories.
Overview
This benchmark tests whether AI agents can correctly select and use the right MCP tools for real-world tasks. It covers data retrieval, blockchain queries, security analysis, academic research, and more.
Categories
Category
Test Cases
Description
Weather
5
Forecasts, UV index, climate history
Blockchain… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/aiagentkarl/agent-evaluation-benchmark.Gender_Bias_Evaluation_SetThis dataset has been created as part of the Flax/JAX community week for testing the flax-sentence-embeddings Sentence Similarity models for Gender Bias but can be used for other use-cases as well related to evaluating Gender Bias.
The Following Dataset has been created for Evaluating Gender Bias for different models, based on various stereotypical occupations.
The Structure of the dataset is of the following type:
Base Sentence
Occupation
Steretypical_Gender
Male Sentence
Female… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/flax-sentence-embeddings/Gender_Bias_Evaluation_Set.RAG_Evaluation_Datasetllm-commit-message-evaluation
Dataset Card for LLM Commit Message Evaluation
The LLM Commit Message Evaluation dataset is designed to evaluate and compare the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) in generating high-quality git commit messages. It contains real-world code diffs, issue descriptions, and issue titles extracted from open-source repositories (such as OWASP/Nest).
For each code change, the dataset provides the original human-written commit message alongside commit messages generated by… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/g-for-gour/llm-commit-message-evaluation.NLU-Evaluation-Data-en-de
NLU Evaluation Data - English and German
A labeled English and German language multi-domain dataset (21 domains) with 25K user utterances for human-robot interaction.
This dataset is collected and annotated for evaluating NLU services and platforms.
The detailed paper on this dataset can be found at arXiv.org:
Benchmarking Natural Language Understanding Services for building Conversational Agents
The dataset builds on the annotated data of the xliuhw/NLU-Evaluation-Data
repository.… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/deutsche-telekom/NLU-Evaluation-Data-en-de.YouTube-Evaluation-Set
Awaaz se Alfaaz — YouTube Evaluation Set
This dataset is the realistic multi-speaker evaluation set used in Awaaz se Alfaaz, accepted at LaTeLL 2026 — "Enhancing Urdu ASR with Whisper v3: Fine-Tuning on Latest Datasets and Realistic Multi-Speaker Evaluation with SLM Post-Processing." It contains 30 short-form Urdu YouTube videos (YouTube Shorts) covering a mix of news, sports, and current affairs content, along with human annotated gold transcripts and transcripts produced by… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/awaaz-se-alfaaz/YouTube-Evaluation-Set.image_gen_ocr_evaluation_data
image_gen_ocr_eval
Author: Peter J. Bevan
Date: 15/12/23
github: https://github.com/pbevan1/image-gen-spelling-eval
Table 1: Normalised Levenshtein similarity scores between instructed text and text present in image (as identified by OCR)
Model
object
signage
natural
long
Overall
DALLE3
0.62
0.62
0.62
0.58
0.61
DeepFloydIF
0.57
0.56
0.66
0.39
0.54
DALLE2
0.44
0.35
0.42
0.22
0.36
SDXL
0.3
0.33
0.4
0.21
0.31
SD
0.28
0.26
0.32
0.22
0.27
PlayGroundV2
0.19
0.23
0.17… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/pbevan11/image_gen_ocr_evaluation_data.normative_evaluation_llms_everyday_dilemmasIELTS-writing-task-2-evaluationperplexity_evaluation
SaulLM-7B: Pioneering the first Legal Large Language Model
Perplexity Analysis
This dataset presents the data used in the paper "SaulLM-7B: Pioneering the first Legal Large Language Model" in "6.3 Perplexity Analysis" section.
The dataset contains the perplexity scores of SaulLM-7B, Llama2-7B and Mistral-7B across a corpora of recent text.
Cleaning
We proceeded to standardize the data by removing any special characters using unicodedata normalization.
We also… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/Equall/perplexity_evaluation.
