endomorphosis/Caselaw_Access_Project_JSON
The Caselaw Access Project In collaboration with Ravel Law, Harvard Law Library digitized over 40 million U.S. court decisions consisting of 6.7 million cases from the last 360 years into a dataset that is widely accessible to use. Access a bulk download of the data through the Caselaw Access Project API (CAPAPI): https://case.law/caselaw/ Find more information about accessing state and federal written court decisions of common law through the bulk data service… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/endomorphosis/Caselaw_Access_Project_JSON.
38.3k
1"{\"id\": \"8753441\", \"name\": \"WEST VIRGINIA SCHOOL OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE CLINIC, INC. vs. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS\", \"name_abbreviation\": \"West Virginia School of Osteopathic Medicine Clinic, Inc. v. Department of Corrections\", \"decision_date\": \"1983-01-25\", \"docket_number\": \"CC-82-306\", \"first_page\": \"349\", \"last_page\": \"350\", \"citations\": \"14 Ct. Cl. 349\", \"volume\": \"14\", \"reporter\": \"Report of the West Virginia Court of Claims\", \"court\": \"West Virginia Court of Claims\", \"jurisdiction\": \"West Virginia\", \"last_updated\": \"2021-08-10T23:12:04.864745+00:00\", \"provenance\": \"CAP\", \"judges\": \"\", \"parties\": \"WEST VIRGINIA SCHOOL OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE CLINIC, INC. vs. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS\", \"head_matter\": \"Opinion issued January 25, 1983\\nWEST VIRGINIA SCHOOL OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE CLINIC, INC. vs. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS\\n(CC-82-306)\\nPaul'S. Detch, Attorney at Law, for claimant.\\nHenry C. Bias, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.\", \"word_count\": \"140\", \"char_count\": \"878\", \"text\": \"PER CURIAM:\\nThis claim was submitted for decision upon the pleadings. The claimant seeks payment for medical services furnished to respondent's Anthony Center in the amount of $14,709.50.\\nThe respondent admits the validity and amount of the claim, but further alleges that sufficient funds were not available at the close of the fiscal year in question from which the obligation could have been paid.\\nThe Court finds that this claim should, in equity and good conscience, be paid, but an award cannot be made, based on the decision in Airkem Sales and Service, et al. v. Department of Mental Health, 8 Ct.Cl. 180 (1971).\\nClaim disallowed.\"}"