endomorphosis/Caselaw_Access_Project_JSON
The Caselaw Access Project In collaboration with Ravel Law, Harvard Law Library digitized over 40 million U.S. court decisions consisting of 6.7 million cases from the last 360 years into a dataset that is widely accessible to use. Access a bulk download of the data through the Caselaw Access Project API (CAPAPI): https://case.law/caselaw/ Find more information about accessing state and federal written court decisions of common law through the bulk data service… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/endomorphosis/Caselaw_Access_Project_JSON.
35.6k
1"{\"id\": \"4669270\", \"name\": \"In re Christine A. Colombe\", \"name_abbreviation\": \"In re Colombe\", \"decision_date\": \"1972-12-14\", \"docket_number\": \"No. 76-72\", \"first_page\": \"21\", \"last_page\": \"21\", \"citations\": \"131 Vt. 21\", \"volume\": \"131\", \"reporter\": \"Vermont Reports\", \"court\": \"Vermont Supreme Court\", \"jurisdiction\": \"Vermont\", \"last_updated\": \"2021-08-10T19:09:33.182239+00:00\", \"provenance\": \"CAP\", \"judges\": \"Present: Shangraw, C.J., Barney, Smith, Keyser and Daley, JJ.\", \"parties\": \"In re Christine A. Colombe\", \"head_matter\": \"In re Christine A. Colombe\\n[298 A.2d 820]\\nNo. 76-72\\nPresent: Shangraw, C.J., Barney, Smith, Keyser and Daley, JJ.\\nOpinion Filed December 14, 1972\\nJames M. Jeffords, Attorney General, Benson D. Scotch, Assistant Attorney General, Richard, L. Brock, Esq., Montpelier, for the child, Plaintiff.\\nMichael Kwpersmith, Esq., Vermont Legal Aid, Inc., Burlington, for the parents, Defendants.\", \"word_count\": \"160\", \"char_count\": \"994\", \"text\": \"Per Curiam.\\nThis is a proceeding to permanently deprive parents of their custodial rights to their infant child under the provisions of 33 V.S.A. \\u00a7 656. As a consequence of an altercation occurring at one of the hearings, the father was committed to Waterbury State Hospital and determined to be insane at the time of the hearing. Since no guardian was appointed to protect this parent's interest in a proceeding involving so vital a right, the resulting judgment cannot stand and a new hearing must be had. See Billings v. Billings, 123 Vt. 324, 326, 187 A.2d 333 (1963).\\nJudgment vacated and cause remanded.\"}"