endomorphosis/Caselaw_Access_Project_JSON
The Caselaw Access Project In collaboration with Ravel Law, Harvard Law Library digitized over 40 million U.S. court decisions consisting of 6.7 million cases from the last 360 years into a dataset that is widely accessible to use. Access a bulk download of the data through the Caselaw Access Project API (CAPAPI): https://case.law/caselaw/ Find more information about accessing state and federal written court decisions of common law through the bulk data service… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/endomorphosis/Caselaw_Access_Project_JSON.
37.2k
1"{\"id\": \"8155285\", \"name\": \"In the Matter of Indirect Contempt of Court of J. Garland EAGLE\", \"name_abbreviation\": \"In re Indirect Contempt of Court of Eagle\", \"decision_date\": \"2000-11-01\", \"docket_number\": \"JAT-99-22\", \"first_page\": 36, \"last_page\": 37, \"citations\": \"2 Am. Tribal Law 36\", \"volume\": \"2\", \"reporter\": \"West's American Tribal Law Reporter\", \"court\": \"Cherokee Nation Judicial Appeals Tribunal\", \"jurisdiction\": \"Tribal Jurisdictions\", \"last_updated\": \"2021-08-10T20:12:42.473076+00:00\", \"provenance\": \"CAP\", \"judges\": \"\", \"parties\": \"In the Matter of Indirect Contempt of Court of J. Garland EAGLE.\", \"head_matter\": \"In the Matter of Indirect Contempt of Court of J. Garland EAGLE.\\nJAT-99-22.\\nCherokee Nation Judicial Appeals Tribunal.\\nNov. 1, 2000.\", \"word_count\": \"410\", \"char_count\": \"2608\", \"text\": \"ORDER\\nNOW ON THIS 1st day of November, 2000, the above styled case comes on for consideration before the Judicial Appeals Tribunal consisting of Justices, Darrell Dowty, presiding, and, Darell R. Matlock, Jr.; Chief Justice, Philip H. Viles, Jr., having entered his Order of Recusal dated October 19, 2000; after examining the files and records in the proceedings, the Judicial Appeals Ti'ibunal enters the following findings and order:\\nThe Judicial Appeals Tribunal being a constitutional body under Article VII of the Constitution of the Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma of 1975 has the supreme authority over decisions of the judicial process of the Cherokee Nation.\\nThe powers of the government of the Cherokee Nation are separate and distinct and neither shall exercise the powers properly belonging to either of the others. Article IV of the Constitution of the Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma of 1975.\\nDecisions of the Cherokee Nation District Court are subject to review by the Cherokee Nation Judicial Appeals Tribunal as the Court of final review. Title 20 Section 11 of the Cherokee Nation Code Annotated.\\nThe Judicial Appeals Tribunal has original and exclusive jurisdiction over any disagreement arising under any provision of the Constitution of the Cherokee Nation. Title 20 Section 51(A) of the Cherokee Nation Code Annotated.\\nThe Judicial Appeals Tribunal has authority to exercise superintendence over courts of inferior jurisdiction. Title 20 Section 52 and Section 53 of the Cherokee Nation Code Annotated.\\nThe Judicial Appeals Tribunal's decisions shall have the force of law, as to the construction and application thereof, in all the Courts of this Nation. Title 20 Section 54 of the Cherokee Nation Code Annotated.\\nThe Judicial Appeals Tribunal has inherent powers to punish for contempt to maintain dignity and authority as contemplated by the Constitution.\\nThe Judicial Appeals Ti'ibunal powers to punish for contempt is \\\"sui generis\\\" (neither civil or criminal) and is to be used by the Court for compelling performance and punishment for disrespect.\\nThe composition of the Judicial Appeals Tribunal at the time indicated in the pleadings issued proper orders in exercise of superintendence over the District Court.\\nThe Judicial Appeals Tribunal further finds that all issues of compelling performance are moot and it would serve no purpose to punish the Respondent.\\nTHEREFORE, on the Court's own motion IT IS ORDERED that the contempt charge be dismissed.\"}"