CoolFace
Datasetpublic

endomorphosis/Caselaw_Access_Project_JSON

The Caselaw Access Project In collaboration with Ravel Law, Harvard Law Library digitized over 40 million U.S. court decisions consisting of 6.7 million cases from the last 360 years into a dataset that is widely accessible to use. Access a bulk download of the data through the Caselaw Access Project API (CAPAPI): https://case.law/caselaw/ Find more information about accessing state and federal written court decisions of common law through the bulk data service… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/endomorphosis/Caselaw_Access_Project_JSON.

sourceHugging Facecc0-1.0updated 2y agoView on Hugging Face
3likes7.2kdownloads
7344868.json1 linesDownload Raw Back to tribal
1"{\"id\": \"7344868\", \"name\": \"HO-CHUNK NATION, Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Defendant\", \"name_abbreviation\": \"Ho-Chunk Nation v. Bank of America, N.A.\", \"decision_date\": \"2006-11-13\", \"docket_number\": \"No. CV 02-93\", \"first_page\": 353, \"last_page\": 353, \"citations\": \"6 Am. Tribal Law 353\", \"volume\": \"6\", \"reporter\": \"West's American Tribal Law Reporter\", \"court\": \"Ho-Chunk Nation Trial Court\", \"jurisdiction\": \"Tribal Jurisdictions\", \"last_updated\": \"2021-08-10T17:52:38.572494+00:00\", \"provenance\": \"CAP\", \"judges\": \"\", \"parties\": \"HO-CHUNK NATION, Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Defendant.\", \"head_matter\": \"HO-CHUNK NATION, Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Defendant.\\nNo. CV 02-93.\\nHo-Chunk Nation Trial Court.\\nNov. 13, 2006.\", \"word_count\": \"214\", \"char_count\": \"1383\", \"text\": \"ORDER (Requiring Status Updates)\\nTODD R. MATHA, Chief Judge.\\nThe Ho-Chunk Nation : Judiciary has continually recognized the principle that a plaintiff maintains the burden to prosecute its case. See, e.g., Joseph D. Ermenc v. HCN Whitetail Crossing, CV 01-88 (HCN Tr. Ct., Sept. 11, 2003) at 6. Applicable procedural rules identify the consequences of prolonged periods of activity. The Court may sua sponte \\\"move to dismiss an action if there has been no filing or activity on the reeord for six (6) months.\\\" Ho-Chunk Nation Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 56(C).\\nOn August 28, 2006, the plaintiff, Ho-Chunk Nation, by and through Attorney Justice E. Lindell, requested a continuance of certain judicial deadlines on behalf of both parties, but has not subsequently corresponded with the Court. The Court acquiesced to the mutual request, but, to reiterate, the plaintiff must prosecute its case. The Court shall require the plaintiff to file status updates at minimum six (6) month intervals beginning on or before December 1, 2006.\\n. Parties can obtain a copy of the applicable rules by contacting the Ho-Chunk Nation Judiciary at (715) 284-2722 or (800) 434-4070 or visiting the judicial website at www.ho-chunknation.com/government/judicial/cons_ law.htm.\"}"