CoolFace
Datasetpublic

endomorphosis/Caselaw_Access_Project_JSON

The Caselaw Access Project In collaboration with Ravel Law, Harvard Law Library digitized over 40 million U.S. court decisions consisting of 6.7 million cases from the last 360 years into a dataset that is widely accessible to use. Access a bulk download of the data through the Caselaw Access Project API (CAPAPI): https://case.law/caselaw/ Find more information about accessing state and federal written court decisions of common law through the bulk data service… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/endomorphosis/Caselaw_Access_Project_JSON.

sourceHugging Facecc0-1.0updated 2y agoView on Hugging Face
3likes5.6kdownloads
4080082.json1 linesDownload Raw Back to sc
1"{\"id\": \"4080082\", \"name\": \"Maria T. CURIEL and Martin L. Curiel, Respondents, v. HAMPTON COUNTY E.M.S., Petitioner\", \"name_abbreviation\": \"Curiel v. Hampton County E.M.S.\", \"decision_date\": \"2015-02-11\", \"docket_number\": \"Appellate Case No. 2013-000391; No. 27496\", \"first_page\": \"426\", \"last_page\": \"427\", \"citations\": \"411 S.C. 426\", \"volume\": \"411\", \"reporter\": \"South Carolina Reports\", \"court\": \"Supreme Court of South Carolina\", \"jurisdiction\": \"South Carolina\", \"last_updated\": \"2021-08-10T21:13:33.810068+00:00\", \"provenance\": \"CAP\", \"judges\": \"TOAL, C.J., PLEICONES, BEATTY, KITTREDGE and HEARN, JJ., concur.\", \"parties\": \"Maria T. CURIEL and Martin L. Curiel, Respondents, v. HAMPTON COUNTY E.M.S., Petitioner.\", \"head_matter\": \"768 S.E.2d 669\\nMaria T. CURIEL and Martin L. Curiel, Respondents, v. HAMPTON COUNTY E.M.S., Petitioner.\\nAppellate Case No. 2013-000391.\\nNo. 27496.\\nSupreme Court of South Carolina.\\nHeard Jan. 15, 2015.\\nDecided Feb. 11, 2015.\\nE. Mitchell Griffith and Mary E. Sharp, both of Griffith, Sadler & Sharp, P.A., of Beaufort, for Petitioner.\\nJohn S. Nichols, of Bluestein, Nichols, Thompson & Delgado, LLC, of Columbia, and H. Woodrow Gooding and Mark B. Tinsley, both of Gooding & Gooding, P.A., of Allendale, for Respondents.\", \"word_count\": \"126\", \"char_count\": \"825\", \"text\": \"PER CURIAM.\\nWe granted certiorari to review the Court of Appeals' decision in Curiel v. Hampton County E.M.S., 401 S.C. 646, 737 S.E.2d 854 (Ct.App.2012). We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.\\nDISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.\\nTOAL, C.J., PLEICONES, BEATTY, KITTREDGE and HEARN, JJ., concur.\"}"