endomorphosis/Caselaw_Access_Project_JSON
The Caselaw Access Project In collaboration with Ravel Law, Harvard Law Library digitized over 40 million U.S. court decisions consisting of 6.7 million cases from the last 360 years into a dataset that is widely accessible to use. Access a bulk download of the data through the Caselaw Access Project API (CAPAPI): https://case.law/caselaw/ Find more information about accessing state and federal written court decisions of common law through the bulk data service… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/endomorphosis/Caselaw_Access_Project_JSON.
37.2k
1"{\"id\": \"8749065\", \"name\": \"EMMA BRUMBAUGH v. STATE\", \"name_abbreviation\": \"Brumbaugh v. State\", \"decision_date\": \"1914\", \"docket_number\": \"No. A-2272\", \"first_page\": \"727\", \"last_page\": \"728\", \"citations\": \"11 Okla. Crim. 727\", \"volume\": \"11\", \"reporter\": \"Oklahoma Criminal Reports\", \"court\": \"Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals\", \"jurisdiction\": \"Oklahoma\", \"last_updated\": \"2021-08-10T21:54:02.449183+00:00\", \"provenance\": \"CAP\", \"judges\": \"\", \"parties\": \"EMMA BRUMBAUGH v. STATE.\", \"head_matter\": \"EMMA BRUMBAUGH v. STATE.\\nNo. A-2272.\\nAppeal from County Court, Comanche County; H. N. Whalin, Judge.\\nEmma Brumbaugh was convicted of violating the prohibitory law, and appeals.\\nReversed.\\nJ. E. Thomas, for plaintiff in error.\\nR. McMillan, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.\", \"word_count\": \"149\", \"char_count\": \"903\", \"text\": \"PER CURIAM.\\nThe plaintiff in error, Emma Brumbaugh, was convicted at the January, 1914, term of the county court of Comanche county on a charge of selling intoxicating liquor, and adjudged to pay a fine of three hundred thirty dollars and to be imprisoned in the county jail for. a period of one hundred days. '\\nThe Attorney General'has conceded error in this ease and advised the court, that in his opinion the judgment of conviction should be reversed.\\nAn examination of the record sustains the confession in error. The judgment of conviction is, therefore, reversed and the cause re.manded, with directions to grant a new trial.\"}"