endomorphosis/Caselaw_Access_Project_JSON
The Caselaw Access Project In collaboration with Ravel Law, Harvard Law Library digitized over 40 million U.S. court decisions consisting of 6.7 million cases from the last 360 years into a dataset that is widely accessible to use. Access a bulk download of the data through the Caselaw Access Project API (CAPAPI): https://case.law/caselaw/ Find more information about accessing state and federal written court decisions of common law through the bulk data service… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/endomorphosis/Caselaw_Access_Project_JSON.
38.3k
1"{\"id\": \"4731464\", \"name\": \"STATE ex rel. W. D. RANKIN, Attorney General, Relator, v. NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY CO. et al., Respondents\", \"name_abbreviation\": \"State ex rel. Rankin v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.\", \"decision_date\": \"1921-01-27\", \"docket_number\": \"No. 4,797\", \"first_page\": \"620\", \"last_page\": \"620\", \"citations\": \"59 Mont. 620\", \"volume\": \"59\", \"reporter\": \"Montana Reports\", \"court\": \"Montana Supreme Court\", \"jurisdiction\": \"Montana\", \"last_updated\": \"2021-08-10T20:21:34.088437+00:00\", \"provenance\": \"CAP\", \"judges\": \"\", \"parties\": \"STATE ex rel. W. D. RANKIN, Attorney General, Relator, v. NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY CO. et al., Respondents.\", \"head_matter\": \"No. 4,797.\\nSTATE ex rel. W. D. RANKIN, Attorney General, Relator, v. NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY CO. et al., Respondents.\\nAPPLICATION for leave to file complaint in supreme court.\\nDecided January 27, 1921.\\nMr. Wellington D. Rankin, Attorney General, pro se.\", \"word_count\": \"108\", \"char_count\": \"671\", \"text\": \"PER CURIAM.\\nThe application of relator herein for permission to file in this court an original complaint seeking an order to show cause and a temporary restraining order enjoining defendant railway companies from putting into effect any and all laws of the state of Montana relating to rates, fares, etc., is, after due consideration, denied, for the reason that the court refuses to take jurisdiction of the cause.\"}"