endomorphosis/Caselaw_Access_Project_JSON
The Caselaw Access Project In collaboration with Ravel Law, Harvard Law Library digitized over 40 million U.S. court decisions consisting of 6.7 million cases from the last 360 years into a dataset that is widely accessible to use. Access a bulk download of the data through the Caselaw Access Project API (CAPAPI): https://case.law/caselaw/ Find more information about accessing state and federal written court decisions of common law through the bulk data service… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/endomorphosis/Caselaw_Access_Project_JSON.
37.2k
1"{\"id\": \"7889343\", \"name\": \"Albert FRYE v. Leon PLANCHE, et al.\", \"name_abbreviation\": \"Frye v. Planche\", \"decision_date\": \"1989-01-12\", \"docket_number\": \"\", \"first_page\": \"550\", \"last_page\": \"550\", \"citations\": \"552 A.2d 550\", \"volume\": \"552\", \"reporter\": \"West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series\", \"court\": \"Maine Supreme Judicial Court\", \"jurisdiction\": \"Maine\", \"last_updated\": \"2021-08-10T20:30:06.019176+00:00\", \"provenance\": \"CAP\", \"judges\": \"Before McKUSICK, C.J., and ROBERTS, WATHEN, GLASSMAN, CLIFFORD and HORNBY, JJ.\", \"parties\": \"Albert FRYE v. Leon PLANCHE, et al.\", \"head_matter\": \"Albert FRYE v. Leon PLANCHE, et al.\\nSupreme Judicial Court of Maine.\\nArgued Jan. 10, 1989.\\nDecided Jan. 12, 1989.\\nGrover Alexander (orally), Gray, for plaintiff.\\nWilliam Kayatta, Jr. (orally), Pierce, Atwood, Scribner, Allen, Smith & Lancaster, Portland, for defendants.\\nBefore McKUSICK, C.J., and ROBERTS, WATHEN, GLASSMAN, CLIFFORD and HORNBY, JJ.\", \"word_count\": \"128\", \"char_count\": \"871\", \"text\": \"MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.\\nContrary to Albert Frye's contention, the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Fritzsche, J.) properly granted summary judgment on Frye's complaint to the defendants, Leone H. Planche, Mark Austin, Thomas Burgess, Milton Calder, Joseph Charron, Ronald Legere and Thomas Ryan, on the ground that Frye failed to serve notice as required by 14 M.R.S.A. \\u00a7 8107(4) (Supp.1988). See Darling v. Augusta Mental Health Institute, 535 A.2d 421, 430 (Me.1987).\\nThe entry is:\\nJudgment affirmed.\\nAll concurring.\"}"