CoolFace
Datasetpublic

endomorphosis/Caselaw_Access_Project_JSON

The Caselaw Access Project In collaboration with Ravel Law, Harvard Law Library digitized over 40 million U.S. court decisions consisting of 6.7 million cases from the last 360 years into a dataset that is widely accessible to use. Access a bulk download of the data through the Caselaw Access Project API (CAPAPI): https://case.law/caselaw/ Find more information about accessing state and federal written court decisions of common law through the bulk data service… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/endomorphosis/Caselaw_Access_Project_JSON.

sourceHugging Facecc0-1.0updated 2y agoView on Hugging Face
3likes5.6kdownloads
1024343.json1 linesDownload Raw Back to md
1"{\"id\": \"1024343\", \"name\": \"SEA WATCH STORES et al., v. COUNCIL OF UNIT OWNERS OF SEA WATCH CONDOMINIUM\", \"name_abbreviation\": \"Sea Watch Stores v. Council of Unit Owners of Sea Watch Condominium\", \"decision_date\": \"1997-11-12\", \"docket_number\": \"No. 77\", \"first_page\": \"622\", \"last_page\": \"623\", \"citations\": \"347 Md. 622\", \"volume\": \"347\", \"reporter\": \"Maryland Reports\", \"court\": \"Court of Appeals of Maryland\", \"jurisdiction\": \"Maryland\", \"last_updated\": \"2021-08-10T21:13:48.715844+00:00\", \"provenance\": \"CAP\", \"judges\": \"\", \"parties\": \"SEA WATCH STORES et al., v. COUNCIL OF UNIT OWNERS OF SEA WATCH CONDOMINIUM.\", \"head_matter\": \"702 A.2d 260\\nSEA WATCH STORES et al., v. COUNCIL OF UNIT OWNERS OF SEA WATCH CONDOMINIUM.\\nNo. 77,\\nSept. Term, 1997.\\nCourt of Appeals of Maryland.\\nNov. 12, 1997.\\nMary T. Keating, Baltimore, for Petitioners.\\nLee H. Ogburn and Kevin F. Arthur, Kramon & Graham, P.A., Baltimore, for Respondent.\\nSubmitted before BELL, C.J., and ELDRIDGE, RODOWSKY, CHASANOW, RAKER and WILNER, JJ.\", \"word_count\": \"131\", \"char_count\": \"784\", \"text\": \"ORDER\\nThe Court having considered the respondent's motion to dismiss the writ of certiorari on the ground of mootness, it is this 12th day of November, 1997,\\nORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the motion to dismiss be, and it is hereby, denied, and it is further\\nORDERED, that the writ of certiorari be, and it is hereby, dismissed with costs, the petition having been improvidently granted.\"}"