AmazonScience/document-haystack
Document Haystack Dataset This repository contains the dataset for the paper “Document Haystack: A Long Context Multimodal Image/Document Understanding Vision LLM Benchmark”. 📑 Abstract Paper The proliferation of multimodal Large Language Models has significantly advanced the ability to analyze and understand complex data inputs from different modalities. However, the processing of long documents remains under-explored, largely due to a lack of suitable… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/AmazonScience/document-haystack.
2090k
1Shareowner Proposals2In accordance with SEC rules, we have set forth below shareowner proposals and the shareowner proponents’ 3supporting statements. The board’s response to each proposal and voting recommendation are also set forth 4below. The board recommends a vote against each proposal because it does not believe the proposals will drive 5or create long-term shareowner value. Each shareowner proposal will be voted on at our Annual Meeting only if 6properly presented at the meeting. The Company is not responsible for any inaccuracies contained in 7the proposals.8Proposal 4 — Shareowner Proposal to Reduce the Voting 9Power of Class A Stock from 10 Votes Per Share to One Vote 10Per Share11What am I voting on? Whether you want the board to take steps to reduce the voting power of the Company’s 12class A stock from 10 votes per share to one vote per share.13Board’s Recommendation: Vote AGAINST this proposal because:14• UPS’s capital structure is unique and does not present risks inherent in typical dual-class structures15• UPS’s capital structure does not concentrate voting power or provide any holder a level of control. Class A 16shares are held by more than 155,000 owners, and management, collectively, holds less than 1% of the 17voting power of our stock18• UPS’s capital structure does not entrench management or the board. There is no controlling founder or 19family, and we regularly refresh management and the board20• UPS’s governance documents provide additional safeguards against traditional dual-class concerns, including 21a de facto “sunset” provision on outstanding shares and voting restrictions applicable to a significant 22voting block23• UPS’s capital structure has contributed to its long-term success24• Eliminating this structure will not further improve UPS’s corporate governance or financial performance25Vote Required: Approval by a majority of the voting power of the shares present in person or by proxy and 26entitled to vote on the proposal.27Shareowner Proposal28John Chevedden, 2215 Nelson Avenue, No. 205, Redondo Beach, CA 90278, has advised us that he intends to 29submit the proposal set forth below for consideration at the Annual Meeting. Share ownership will be promptly 30provided upon request to the UPS Corporate Secretary.31Proposal 4 - Equal Voting Rights for Each Shareholder 32Shareholders request that our Board of Directors take steps to ensure that all of our company's outstanding 33stock has an equal one-vote per share in each shareholder voting situation. This would encompass all practicable 34steps including encouragement and negotiation with current and future shareholders, who have more than one-35vote per share, to request that they relinquish, for the common good of all shareholders, any preexisting rights, 36if necessary.37This proposal is not intended to unnecessarily limit our Board's judgment in crafting the requested change in 38accordance with applicable laws and existing contracts. This proposal is important because certain shares have 39super-sized voting power with 10-votes per share compared to only one-vote per share for other shareholders. 40Corporate governance advocates have suggested a 7-year transition to equal voting rights for each share.416842 43Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareowners and 2024 Proxy Statement