CoolFace
Apppublic

osanseviero/example-testn

sourceHugging Faceupdated 4y agoView on Hugging Face
0likes
pre-rebase.sample170 linesDownload Raw Back to root
1#!/bin/sh2#3# Copyright (c) 2006, 2008 Junio C Hamano4#5# The "pre-rebase" hook is run just before "git rebase" starts doing6# its job, and can prevent the command from running by exiting with7# non-zero status.8#9# The hook is called with the following parameters:10#11# $1 -- the upstream the series was forked from.12# $2 -- the branch being rebased (or empty when rebasing the current branch).13#14# This sample shows how to prevent topic branches that are already15# merged to 'next' branch from getting rebased, because allowing it16# would result in rebasing already published history.17 18publish=next19basebranch="$1"20if test "$#" = 221then22	topic="refs/heads/$2"23else24	topic=`git symbolic-ref HEAD` ||25	exit 0 ;# we do not interrupt rebasing detached HEAD26fi27 28case "$topic" in29refs/heads/??/*)30	;;31*)32	exit 0 ;# we do not interrupt others.33	;;34esac35 36# Now we are dealing with a topic branch being rebased37# on top of master.  Is it OK to rebase it?38 39# Does the topic really exist?40git show-ref -q "$topic" || {41	echo >&2 "No such branch $topic"42	exit 143}44 45# Is topic fully merged to master?46not_in_master=`git rev-list --pretty=oneline ^master "$topic"`47if test -z "$not_in_master"48then49	echo >&2 "$topic is fully merged to master; better remove it."50	exit 1 ;# we could allow it, but there is no point.51fi52 53# Is topic ever merged to next?  If so you should not be rebasing it.54only_next_1=`git rev-list ^master "^$topic" ${publish} | sort`55only_next_2=`git rev-list ^master           ${publish} | sort`56if test "$only_next_1" = "$only_next_2"57then58	not_in_topic=`git rev-list "^$topic" master`59	if test -z "$not_in_topic"60	then61		echo >&2 "$topic is already up to date with master"62		exit 1 ;# we could allow it, but there is no point.63	else64		exit 065	fi66else67	not_in_next=`git rev-list --pretty=oneline ^${publish} "$topic"`68	/usr/bin/perl -e '69		my $topic = $ARGV[0];70		my $msg = "* $topic has commits already merged to public branch:\n";71		my (%not_in_next) = map {72			/^([0-9a-f]+) /;73			($1 => 1);74		} split(/\n/, $ARGV[1]);75		for my $elem (map {76				/^([0-9a-f]+) (.*)$/;77				[$1 => $2];78			} split(/\n/, $ARGV[2])) {79			if (!exists $not_in_next{$elem->[0]}) {80				if ($msg) {81					print STDERR $msg;82					undef $msg;83				}84				print STDERR " $elem->[1]\n";85			}86		}87	' "$topic" "$not_in_next" "$not_in_master"88	exit 189fi90 91<<\DOC_END92 93This sample hook safeguards topic branches that have been94published from being rewound.95 96The workflow assumed here is:97 98 * Once a topic branch forks from "master", "master" is never99   merged into it again (either directly or indirectly).100 101 * Once a topic branch is fully cooked and merged into "master",102   it is deleted.  If you need to build on top of it to correct103   earlier mistakes, a new topic branch is created by forking at104   the tip of the "master".  This is not strictly necessary, but105   it makes it easier to keep your history simple.106 107 * Whenever you need to test or publish your changes to topic108   branches, merge them into "next" branch.109 110The script, being an example, hardcodes the publish branch name111to be "next", but it is trivial to make it configurable via112$GIT_DIR/config mechanism.113 114With this workflow, you would want to know:115 116(1) ... if a topic branch has ever been merged to "next".  Young117    topic branches can have stupid mistakes you would rather118    clean up before publishing, and things that have not been119    merged into other branches can be easily rebased without120    affecting other people.  But once it is published, you would121    not want to rewind it.122 123(2) ... if a topic branch has been fully merged to "master".124    Then you can delete it.  More importantly, you should not125    build on top of it -- other people may already want to126    change things related to the topic as patches against your127    "master", so if you need further changes, it is better to128    fork the topic (perhaps with the same name) afresh from the129    tip of "master".130 131Let's look at this example:132 133		   o---o---o---o---o---o---o---o---o---o "next"134		  /       /           /           /135		 /   a---a---b A     /           /136		/   /               /           /137	       /   /   c---c---c---c B         /138	      /   /   /             \         /139	     /   /   /   b---b C     \       /140	    /   /   /   /             \     /141    ---o---o---o---o---o---o---o---o---o---o---o "master"142 143 144A, B and C are topic branches.145 146 * A has one fix since it was merged up to "next".147 148 * B has finished.  It has been fully merged up to "master" and "next",149   and is ready to be deleted.150 151 * C has not merged to "next" at all.152 153We would want to allow C to be rebased, refuse A, and encourage154B to be deleted.155 156To compute (1):157 158	git rev-list ^master ^topic next159	git rev-list ^master        next160 161	if these match, topic has not merged in next at all.162 163To compute (2):164 165	git rev-list master..topic166 167	if this is empty, it is fully merged to "master".168 169DOC_END170